Brenda I. Martinez, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Northeast Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 27, 2011
0120100825 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 27, 2011)

0120100825

07-27-2011

Brenda I. Martinez, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Northeast Area), Agency.




Brenda I. Martinez,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Northeast Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120100825

Agency No. 1B011000609

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated November 16, 2009, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as a Clerk at the Agency’s Processing and Distribution Center in

Springfield, Massachusetts. On October 26, 2009, Complainant filed a

formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination

on the basis of her sex when: (1) on July 8, 2009, she was witness to

inappropriate sexual comments by a management official, and management

failed to respond appropriately when she complained about the comments;

and (2) on August 12, 2009, her supervisor made disparaging remarks

about her in his response to her grievance.

The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §

1614.107(a)(1), for failure to state a claim. Specifically, the Agency

found that Complainant was not aggrieved, and that she failed to show

that the incidents alleged were sufficiently severe or pervasive to state

an actionable claim of harassment. On appeal, Complainant contends

that the management official at issue in claim (1) made several other

inappropriate comments in her presence, and that the Agency has not

satisfactorily addressed her concerns.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under

the EEOC regulations because Complainant failed to show that she

suffered harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege

of employment for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Dep't of the Air

Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (Apr. 21, 1994). Moreover, to the extent

Complainant is claiming a discriminatory hostile work environment, the

Commission finds that the events described, even if proven to be true,

would not indicate that Complainant has been subjected to harassment that

was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the terms or conditions of

her employment. See Cobb v. Dep't of the Treasury, Request No. 05970077

(Mar. 13, 1997). In so finding, we note that Complainant does not allege

that she was the subject of any inappropriate comments, nor does she

allege that any of the comments at issue were addressed to her.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Agency’s final decision dismissing Complainant’s

complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File A Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 27, 2011

__________________

Date

2

0120100825

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120100825