Brenda E. Shawe, Appellant,v.Louis Caldera, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 23, 1999
01984200 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 23, 1999)

01984200

06-23-1999

Brenda E. Shawe, Appellant, v. Louis Caldera, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Brenda E. Shawe v. Department of the Army

01984200

June 23, 1999

Brenda E. Shawe, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01984200

) Agency No. BEFLFO9703H0110

Louis Caldera, )

Secretary, )

Department of the Army, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

In her complaint, appellant alleged that she was subjected to

discrimination in reprisal for prior EEO activity when:

she did not make the selection list for a Contract Specialist position;

she was treated abusively and on June 27, 1996, her supervisor screamed

at her and grabbed her chair with appellant in it and pushed it around

and into the desk and file cabinet;

she was denied vacation time;

she was not afforded the opportunity to perform or learn like lower

graded colleagues;

on September 30, 1996, she was harassed when work that was previously

taken from her was given back to her, which resulted in co-workers being

led to believe that appellant was at fault when they had to remain at

work until 2 am;

no one offered solutions regarding her work situation during a November

1996 mediation session;

after disagreeing with her on something, the Chief of Contracting stated

that she needed to get rid of three 1100 series employees;

she was denied a request to work compensatory time during the evenings

instead of weekends;

she received a less-than-exceeds performance rating, she did not receive

a copy of it, and she did not get a response to a note that she wrote

regarding the appraisal; and

she did not receive an award for her work on the credit card program.

Upon review, we find that allegation 1 of appellant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(b), on the grounds

that appellant failed to file her formal complaint in a timely manner.

Appellant received a notice of right to file a discrimination complaint on

May 23, 1997. Appellant did not file her formal EEO complaint until June

25, 1997, after the expiration of the 15-day filing period. Allegations

3-10 of appellant's complaint were properly dismissed pursuant to 29

C.F.R. �1614.107(b), on the grounds that appellant failed to raise the

issues with an EEO Counselor and they were not like or related to matters

that were brought to the attention of an EEO Counselor. We further find

that allegation 2 of appellant's complaint was properly dismissed pursuant

to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a), on the grounds that the allegation set forth

the same claim that is pending before or has been decided by the agency

or the Commission. Accordingly, the final agency decision dismissing

appellant's complaint on the aforementioned grounds is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS

OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

June 23, 1999

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations