Bremerton Sun Publishing Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJun 27, 1974212 N.L.R.B. 129 (N.L.R.B. 1974) Copy Citation BREMERTON SUN PUBLISHING CO. 129 Bremerton Sun Publishing Company and Pacific Northwest Newspaper Guild Local 82, The Newspa- per Guild, AFL-CIO, Petitioner . Case 19-RC-6914 June 27, 1974 DECISION ON REVIEW BY MEMBERS JENKINS, KENNEDY, AND PENNELLO On January 17, 1974, the Regional Director for Region 19 issued a Decision and Direction of Election in the above-entitled proceeding in which he found appropriate the Petitioner's requested unit of all non- mechanical employees, excluding outside circulation and mailroom employees. Thereafter, in accordance with National Labor Relations Board Rules and Re- gulations, the Employer filed a timely request for re- view of the Regional Director's Decision on the grounds that in excluding outside circulation and mailroom employees from the unit, he departed from officially reported Board precedent and that there are compelling reasons for reconsideration of an impor- tant Board policy. By telegraphic order dated February 11, the Na- tional Labor Relations Board granted the request for review only with respect to the unit placement of mail- room employees and stayed the election pending deci- sion on review. Thereafter, the Petitioner filed a brief on review. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the Na- tional Labor Relations Board has delegated its au- thority in this proceeding to a three-member panel. The Board has considered the entire record in this case with respect to the issues under review, including the Petitioner's brief on review, and hereby affirms the Regional Director's determination to exclude mailroom employees from the requested unit, for the following reasons: The Employer is engaged in the publishing, print- ing, and distribution of a 6-day-per-week daily news- paper in Kitsap County, Washington. The Employer agreed that the requested unit of nonmechanical em- ployees is appropriate,' except that, contrary to the Petitioner, it would have included outside circulation and mailroom employees. The Regional Director ex- cluded both categories. The outside circulation employees, as to whose ex- clusion the Board has denied review, consist of 1 street salesman, 5 district managers, and 15 motor route drivers. These employees deliver bundled news- papers to newsstands, stores, and carrier pickup points, and they make tube deliveries in assigned ar- eas. They work on a part-time basis, and are super- vised by the circulation manager. ' The parties had agreed to exclude the maintenance employees There are 26 employees in the mailroom: a fore- man, 2 flyboys, 1 loader-mailer, 1 mail clerk, and 21 stuffers. The mailroom foreman operates the tying machine and works approximately 20 hours per week. The flyboys pick up newspapers from the press con- veyor and bundle them for the tying machines, put individual copies into mailing envelopes for mailing through the post office, and perform some cleanup duties. They are paid by the hour and average about 20 hours per week. The loader-mailer picks up the newspapers after they have been tied by machine and conveyed to the dock and places them in a car or truck for distribution by the motor route drivers. He is paid by the hour and averages about 25 hours per week. The mail clerk prepares mailing labels on the addres- sograph machine and keeps them up to date. He works approximately 25 hours a week. The 21 stuffers insert preprinted advertising inserts into the newspapers and at times help put individual editions into mailing envelopes. Over the course of a calendar year, they average about 9 hours of work per week and usually work those hours over a span of 2 days a week. The mailroom employees, like the circu- lation employees, work under the supervision of the circulation manager. Upon the foregoing, we conclude that the mailroom employees share a closer community of interest with the excluded outside circulation employees than with the other nonmechanical employees agreed to be in- cluded in the unit. Aside from the fact that both groups work under common supervision on a part- time basis performing the end function of mailing and delivery of the finished newspapers, the mailroom em- ployees together with the outside circulation employ- ees comprise virtually the entire circulation department. We therefore agree with the Regional Director's conclusion that they, along with the outside circulation employees, should be excluded from the unit.' Accordingly, we shall remand the case to the Re- gional Director in order that he may conduct an elec- tion pursuant to his Decision and Direction of Election, except that the eligibility payroll period therefor shall be the one immediately preceding the issuance date of this Decision on Review.3 2 See Lowell Sun Publishing Company, 132 NLRB 1168, The Peoria Journal Star, Inc, 117 NLRB 708,712 3 In order to assure that all eligible voters may have the opportunity to be informed of the issues in the exercise of their statutory right to vote, all parties to the election should have access to a list of voters and their addresses which may be used to communicate with them Excelsior Underwear Inc, 156 NLRB 1236, N L R B v Wyman-Gordon Co, 394 U S. 759 Accordingly, it is hereby directed that a corrected election eligibility list, containing the names and addresses of all the eligible voters, must be filed by the Employer with the Regional Director for Region 19 within 7 days of the date of this Decision on Review The Regional Director shall make the list available to all parties to the election No extension of time to file this list shall be granted by the Regional Director except in extraordinary circumstances Failure to comply with this requirement shall be grounds for setting aside the election whenever proper objections are filed 212 NLRB No. 18 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation