Bonnie M. Femling, Complainant,v.Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary, Department of the Interior, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 19, 2008
0120082272 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 19, 2008)

0120082272

09-19-2008

Bonnie M. Femling, Complainant, v. Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary, Department of the Interior, Agency.


Bonnie M. Femling,

Complainant,

v.

Dirk Kempthorne,

Secretary,

Department of the Interior,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120082272

Agency No. BOR-2007-0261

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from a final

agency decision dated March 18, 2008, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section

501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq. Upon review, the

Commission finds that complainant's complaint was properly dismissed

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).

On May 8, 2007, complainant initiated EEO contact alleging that the agency

subjected her to hostile work environment harassment based on sex (female)

and age (over 40). To support her harassment claim, complainant alleged

that (1) on April 23, 2007, someone anonymously left a magazine article

about "hoarding" on her desk, (2) on April 23, 2007, a male coworker

(C1) told her that she should retire and that she is stupid, (3) on

April 24, 2007, another male coworker returned drawings un-reviewed to

her that she submitted to him for peer review, (4) on unspecified dates,

C1 made negative comments about women generally, (5) between February

and May 2007, due to C1's negative attitude, team members refused to

rotate serving as acting supervisor, (6) between February and May 2007,

C1 and another coworker held keys to their former supervisor's office

and supervisory rights to his work database, (7) since April 1997,

complainant's work group has indicated numbers in the wrong area on

drawings, (8) in October 1996, complainant and another coworker did

not feel welcome in their new office following placement there due to

a reduction-in-force, and (9) C1 is the only person who held a GS-7 in

the office. On August 15, 2007, complainant filed a formal EEO complaint

reiterating her claim of harassment, adding the bases of disability

(Anxiety Disorder) and reprisal for prior EEO activity, and noting that

her former supervisor admonished her regarding religious issues, such

as blood donation.

In its March 18, 2008 final decision, the agency dismissed complainant's

claim for failure to state a claim. Specifically, the agency found

that complainant did not allege actions that affect a term, condition or

privilege of employment for which there is a remedy or that were severe

or pervasive enough to rise to the level of a hostile work environment.

The agency concluded that complainant failed to show that she was

aggrieved. Further, regarding the claim of supervisory admonishment

regarding religious issues, the agency dismissed that matter for failing

to bring it to the attention of an EEO Counselor. The instant appeal

from complainant followed.

After a careful review of the record, we determine that the actions

alleged, both individually and together, fail to rise to the level of

a hostile work environment. Further, we find that the agency actions

alleged were not of a type reasonably likely to deter complainants or

others from engaging in protected activity. Accordingly, we AFFIRM

the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 19, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120082272

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3 0120082272