01a10541
11-30-2000
Bob Cariffe, Complainant, v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Agency.
Bob Cariffe v. Department of Commerce
01A10541
November 30, 2000
.
Bob Cariffe,
Complainant,
v.
Norman Y. Mineta,
Secretary,
Department of Commerce,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A10541
Agency No. 00-63-014060
DECISION
The instant matter is being processed pursuant to a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) entered into by the agency, the Bureau of the Census,
and the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The MOU
was entered into in order to process complaints arising from the 2000
Decennial Census more effectively and efficiently.
Pursuant to the MOU, individuals file their complaints directly with
the Commission. The Commission, through its Washington, D.C. Field
Office, then conducts an early assessment of complaints and neutral
evaluation of cases. The Washington, D.C. Field Office of the Commission
establishes a record of the complaint by obtaining an affidavit from the
complainant and by contacting an agency official to obtain the necessary
information on the complaint. Based on the record established by the
Washington, D.C. Field Office, the Washington, D.C. Field Office will:
(1) notify the agency that the individual has elected not to file a
formal complaint; (2) issue a decision dismissing the complaint and
notify the complainant of his or her right to appeal the decision to
the Office of Federal Operations; (3) conduct settlement negotiations;
or (4) notify the complainant that the complaint has been accepted and
forward the complaint to the agency for further investigation.
The Commission's Washington, D.C. Field Office dismissed the instant
complaint for failure to state a claim. Specifically, the Field Office
found that complainant failed to raise his claims on a protected basis.
In his complaint, complainant argued that he was not given other
jobs/assignments in retaliation for statements he made to his Crew
Leader.
In counseling, complainant explained that his crew leader agreed
to call him, but failed to do so. The crew leader then criticized
complainant for not calling her. In his formal complaint dated May 10,
2000, complainant contends that he told the crew leader that it was
�asinine� of her to expect him to call when she agreed to call him.
In an affidavit dated July 16, 2000, complainant asserted that he told
the crew leader she was incapable of handling her duties with the agency
and work in a restaurant. Complainant did not raise any other basis for
his complaints in counseling, his formal complaint, or in his affidavit.
On appeal, complainant argues for the first time that he was discriminated
against because of his race. He contends that he was not given further
assignments because he, as a Caucasian male, dared to argue with an
Asian female.
EEOC Regulations require the dismissal of complaints that fail to
state a claim. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). To state a claim,
complainant must allege present harm inflicted on the basis of race, sex,
religion, national origin, age, disability, or prior protected activity.
See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049
(April 21, 1994). In claims alleging retaliation, complainant must
have engaged in prior protected activity to state a cognizable claim.
Prior protected activity includes opposition to practices made unlawful
by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended,
42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of
1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq., the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.,
or the Equal Pay Act of 1963, as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 206(d) et seq.
In the present complaint, complainant has presented no evidence that
he engaged in prior protected activity. Therefore, his retaliation
complaint fails to state a claim. Further, complainant failed to raise
any other basis for his complaint until the present appeal. His belated
attempt to provide a basis for his complaint is insufficient.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, the Field Office's dismissal is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0900)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
November 30, 2000
__________________
Date