Bevin M. Parkins, Complainant,v.Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 28, 2008
0120081530 (E.E.O.C. May. 28, 2008)

0120081530

05-28-2008

Bevin M. Parkins, Complainant, v. Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.


Bevin M. Parkins,

Complainant,

v.

Michael Chertoff,

Secretary,

Department of Homeland Security,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120081530

Agency No. HS-06-FEMA-006462

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's

appeal from a final agency decision dated November 30, 2007, concerning

his equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaint alleging employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and the Age

Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

621 et seq.

At the time of the events at issue, complainant was employment by the

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as a Human Services Specialist,

GS-7, in Hyattsville, Maryland. In a formal EEO complaint and subsequent

amendment, complainant alleged that the agency discriminated against him

on the bases of race (African-American), national origin (Jamaican),

color (Brown), and age (over 40) when: (1) on January 1, 2006, his

immediate supervisor subjected him to hostile work environment harassment

by speaking to him in a threatening and condescending manner, which

resulted in complainant having an anxiety attack, (2) management issued

complainant a Notice of Termination of Appointment, and (3) management

refused to assist complainant with obtaining medical assistance or leave.

Briefly, the investigation into the complaint reveals that on January 1,

2006, complainant was meeting with his supervisor to discuss various

topics, including complainant's leave slip for an unspecified number

of days. The supervisor apparently stated the leave request could not

be approved without a manager's concurrence. The supervisor stated that

complainant became angry and started shouting. Complainant stated the

supervisor was very intimidating, used a loud voice and acted nasty.

Complainant left the meeting when he began to experience chest pains

in order to get his blood pressure medication. He never returned to the

meeting. From January 2, 2006 onward, complainant was absent from work.

Complainant alleged that on January 7, 2006, the supervisor called

his home and asked why he was absent from work. The supervisor stated

she called complainant because he had been absent for more than three

days. On March 17, 2006, management requested medical documentation

to support complainant's extended absence from work. Complainant's

doctor indicted that he was unable to work because his return to the

workplace would trigger anxiety attacks. Based the doctor's opinion

that complainant was unable to work, agency management terminated his

appointment on April 28, 2006. The agency stated that complainant was

provided with information on how to apply for workers' compensation if

he believed his medical condition was work-related.

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration

of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to AFFIRM the agency's final decision

because the preponderance of the evidence of record does not establish

that discrimination occurred. Complainant failed to show that the

legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons articulated by the agency are

pretext, or that the actions alleged rose to the level of a hostile work

environment or were based on discriminatory motives.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in

which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must

be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 28, 2008

______________________

Date

3

0120081530

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036