Betty T. Carr, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 30, 2011
0120092669 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 30, 2011)

0120092669

03-30-2011

Betty T. Carr, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.


Betty T. Carr,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southeast Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120092669

Agency No. 1H-372-0015-07

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from a final

decision (FAD) by the Agency dated April 15, 2009, finding that it was

in compliance with the terms of the settlement agreement into which the

parties entered. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.402; 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504(b);

and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as an Inside Expediter at the Agency's Processing and Distribution

Center facility in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Believing that the Agency

subjected her to unlawful discrimination, Complainant contacted an Agency

EEO Counselor to initiate the EEO complaint process. On July 28, 2008,

Complainant and the Agency entered into a settlement agreement to resolve

the matter. The settlement agreement provided, in pertinent part, that:

Complainant will have retreat rights under the American Postal Workers

Union, National Contract in the event the job of inside expediter is

later to be determined to be needed.

By letter to the Agency dated February 7, 2009, Complainant alleged that

the Agency was in breach of the settlement agreement, and requested that

the Agency specifically implement its terms. Specifically, Complainant

alleged that the Agency abolished her position. Subsequently, the Agency

reposted the position and placed another employee in Complainant's former

position.

In its April 15, 2009 FAD, the Agency concluded that it did not breach

the settlement agreement. The Agency noted that Complainant's position

was abolished. However, the Agency indicated that it changed the

duties of the position. As such, it was posted as a different position.

Complainant appealed asserting that the Agency abolished her position

and failed to provide her with retreat rights.

ANALYSIS

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504(a) provides that any settlement

agreement knowingly and voluntarily agreed to by the parties, reached at

any stage of the complaint process, shall be binding on both parties.

The Commission has held that a settlement agreement constitutes a

contract between the employee and the Agency, to which ordinary rules

of contract construction apply. See Herrington v. Dep't of Def., EEOC

Request No. 05960032 (December 9, 1996). The Commission has further

held that it is the intent of the parties as expressed in the contract,

not some unexpressed intention, that controls the contract's construction.

Eggleston v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05900795 (August

23, 1990). In ascertaining the intent of the parties with regard to the

terms of a settlement agreement, the Commission has generally relied on

the plain meaning rule. See Hyon O v. U.S. Postal Serv., EEOC Request

No. 05910787 (December 2, 1991). This rule states that if the writing

appears to be plain and unambiguous on its face, its meaning must be

determined from the four corners of the instrument without resort to

extrinsic evidence of any nature. See Montgomery Elevator Co. v. Building

Eng'g Servs. Co., 730 F.2d 377 (5th Cir. 1984).

The Commission finds that the instant agreement is void for lack of

consideration. Generally, the adequacy or fairness of the consideration

in a settlement agreement is not an issue, as long as some legal detriment

is incurred as part of the bargain. However, when one of the contracting

parties incurs no legal detriment, the settlement agreement will be

set aside for lack of consideration. See McNair v. U.S. Postal Serv.,

EEOC Appeal No. 01964653 (July 1, 1997); Juhola v. Dep't. of the Army,

EEOC Appeal No. 01934032 (June 30, 1994) (citing Terracina v. Dep't

of Health and Human Serv.., EEOC Request No. 05910888 (March 11, 1992).

Here, the terms of the agreement fail to confer on Complainant any benefit

that she was not already entitled to pursuant to the Collective Bargaining

Agreement. Therefore, we find that Complainant received no consideration

for withdrawing her complaint and the settlement agreement is void.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Agency's decision finding it did not breach the

settlement agreement is VACATED. The matter is REMANDED to the Agency for

further processing in accordance with this decision and the ORDER below.

ORDER

The Agency is ORDERED to resume processing of Complainant's underlying

complaint from the point where processing ceased. The Agency shall

acknowledge to Complainant that it has reinstated and resumed processing

of her underlying EEO complaint. A copy of the Agency's letter of

acknowledgment must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced

below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington,

DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation,

and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant.

If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil

Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 30, 2011

__________________

Date

2

0120092669

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

5

0120092669