Benna Logan, Complainant,v.Ray H. LaHood, Secretary, Department of Transportation, (Federal Aviation Administration), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 17, 2010
0120093439 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 17, 2010)

0120093439

02-17-2010

Benna Logan, Complainant, v. Ray H. LaHood, Secretary, Department of Transportation, (Federal Aviation Administration), Agency.


Benna Logan,

Complainant,

v.

Ray H. LaHood,

Secretary,

Department of Transportation,

(Federal Aviation Administration),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120093439

Agency No. 200922598FAA03

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision (FAD) dated July 21, 2009, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. In her

complaint, complainant alleged that she was subjected to discrimination

on the bases of sex (female) and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity

under a statute that remains unspecified tin the record when:

1. Complainant learned that she was being charged with an Operational

Error (OE); and

2. Complainant was not selected for a permanent position to which she

had been detailed.

The agency characterized the claims as a single claim and dismissed the

claim for untimely EEO Counselor contact. In its FAD, the agency found

that the Training Review Board had initially recommended that an Air

Traffic Controller be charged with the OE, but that on October 17, 2008,

the Air Traffic Manager (RMO1) found instead that complainant should be

charged with the OE. The FAD further found that the Area Director (RMO2)

approved RMO1's decision on November 28, 2008. The agency therefore found

that complainant's March 10, 2009 EEO Counselor contact was untimely.

On appeal, complainant maintains that she was never informed of the

decisions of either RMO 1 or 2, and to date she has still not received a

formal notification of the OE charge. She states that she only found

out about the OE charge on February 23 2009, when she was informed by

a colleague and hence her Counselor contact is timely. In addition,

she points out that the agency failed to address the nonselection claim.

Where, as here, there is an issue of timeliness, "[a]n agency always bears

the burden of obtaining sufficient information to support a reasoned

determination as to timeliness." Guy, v. Department of Energy, EEOC

Request No. 05930703 (January 4, 1994) (quoting Williams v. Department of

Defense, EEOC Request No. 05920506 (August 25, 1992)). In addition, in

Ericson v. Department of the Army, EEOC Request No. 05920623 (January 14,

1993), the Commission stated that "the agency has the burden of providing

evidence and/or proof to support its final decisions." See also Gens

v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05910837 (January 31, 1992).

In the instant case, the agency merely finds that the personnel action

occurred in October and November 2008. We note, however, that the FAD

does not provide a date when complainant was notified of the decision.

Furthermore, as complainant points out on appeal, the agency has not

provided copies of a notification showing that complainant was notified of

the decision on any specific date. The record contains a copy of RMO1's

decision but that document does not contain complainant's signature

or otherwise indicate that complainant was made aware of the decision

on any specific date. The record also contains a copy of an e-mail

dated September 24, 2009, that states that complainant's supervisor

and manager "are knowledgeable of when [complainant] became aware that

she was charged with an OE." Again, however, that document does not

indicate when complainant became aware of the OE charge and furthermore,

it is not a signed affidavit. We therefore find that the agency has

not met its burden of establishing that complainant's March 10, 2009

Counselor contact was untimely. In addition, we note that the FAD did

not address complainant's noneselection claim and complainant has not

stated when she was notified of the nonselection.

For the above reasons we REVERSE the FAD and REMAND the complaint to

the agency for additional processing.

ORDER (E0408)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1208)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington,

DC 20013. The agency's report must contain supporting documentation,

and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the complainant.

If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil

Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29

U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the

sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the

Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 17, 2010

__________________

Date

2

0120093439

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

5

0120093439