Benjamin Russell, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 20, 2008
0120082666 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 20, 2008)

0120082666

08-20-2008

Benjamin Russell, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Benjamin Russell,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120082666

Agency No. 1E895000307

Hearing No. 550200800043X

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's

appeal from the agency's May 16, 2008 final order concerning his equal

employment opportunity (EEO) complaint alleging employment discrimination

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII),

as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Complainant alleged that the agency discriminated against him on the

bases of race (Asian), national origin (Filipino), and reprisal for prior

protected EEO activity under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

when he was issued a notice of removal for failure to comply with agency

standards of conduct. Following an investigation into his complaint,

an EEOC Administrative Judge issued a decision by summary judgment in

favor of the agency.

Briefly, the evidence of record indicates that complainant was arrested

for allegedly drawing a gun on a fast food cashier while at the drive-thru

window. Complainant was apparently upset when he was told he had to

go inside to use his coupons. The incident was reported in the local

newspapers and the agency investigated the incident. Agency management

sent complainant for a "dangerousness" assessment, and the examining

physician did not recommend his return to work. Complainant was placed on

indefinite suspension, which eventually led to his removal. According to

an arbitrator's decision, which denied complainant's grievance on his

removal, complainant had previously pointed a gun at an agency employee,

was involved in a road rage incident where he pointed a gun at the driver,

and had previously been removed from the agency for threatening to throw

hot coffee in a co-worker's face. In addition, other employees complained

that they were intimidated and afraid of complaint. The record contains

copies of their complaints.1

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration

of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm the agency's final order,

because the Administrative Judge's issuance of a decision without a

hearing was appropriate and a preponderance of the record evidence does

not establish that discrimination occurred.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 20, 2008

__________________

Date

1 Complainant's indefinite suspension was upheld by the arbitrator as

well. In addition, the Commission addressed the suspension in Appeal

No. 0120072529 (July 17, 2007), finding no discrimination.

??

??

??

??

2

0120082666

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120082666