Belcher Towing Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jan 19, 1960

126 N.L.R.B. 197 (N.L.R.B. 1960)

BELCHER TOWING COMPANY 197
Belcher Towing Company and Seafarers ' International Union
of North America, Atlantic & Gulf District, Harbor & Inland
Waterways Division , AFL-CIO.' Case No. 12-CA-1018. Janu-
ary 19, 1960
DECISION AND ORDER
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon a charge filed on June 3, 1959, by Seafarers' International
Union of North America, Atlantic & Gulf District, Harbor &
Inland Waterways Division, AFL-CIO, hereinafter called the Union,
and amended on July 1, 1959, the General Counsel of the National
Labor Relations Board, hereinafter called respectively the General
Counsel and the Board, by the Regional Director for the Twelfth
Region (Tampa, Florida) issued a complaint, dated July 17, 1959,
against Belcher Towing Company, hereinafter called the Respondent,
alleging that the Respondent had engaged in and was engaging in
unfair labor practices affecting commerce within the meaning of
Section 8(a) (5) and (1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the National
Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61 Stat. 136, herein called the Act.
Copies of the charge, the amended charge, and the complaint were
duly served on the Respondent.
With respect to the unfair labor practices, the complaint alleges
in substance that on January 9, 1959, following a Board-directed elec-
tion in Belcher Towing Company, Case No. 12-RC-304,2 in which a
majority of the Respondent's employees in the unit found appropriate
by the Board chose the Union as their collective-bargaining repre-
sentative, the Board certified the Union as such representative; that
thereafter the Union requested the Respondent to bargain with it
collectively with respect to the wages, rates of pay, hours of employ-
ment, and other conditions of employment of the employees in the
appropriate unit; and that the Respondent refused and continues to
refuse to do so, thereby engaging in unfair labor practices in violation
of Section 8(a) (5) of the Act, and thereby interfering with, restrain-
ing, and coercing the Respondent's employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act, in violation of Section
8(a) (1) thereof. On or about July 27, 1959, the Respondent filed an
answer to the complaint, admitting its jurisdictional allegations and
the refusal to bargain as alleged, but denying that the Respondent
had committed the alleged unfair labor practices.
Thereafter, on September 30, 1959, desiring to avoid the need for
a hearing, the parties entered into a stipulation, which set forth an
i The name of the Union is amended to conform to its designation in the representa-
tion case discussed hereinafter.
' Unpublished.
126 NLRB No. 32.
198 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
agreed statement of facts. The stipulation further provided, in effect,
that: (1) The Board may find the facts contained in the stipulation,
in addition to those portions of the complaint admitted in the answer,
to be true and correct; (2) the parties waive a hearing herein, the
issuance of an Intermediate Report and Recommended Order by
a Trial Examiner, and any other Board procedures inconsistent with
the stipulation; (3) the Board may make findings of facts and con-
clusions of law on the basis of the facts set forth in the stipulation
and issue its Decision and Order based thereon, as if these facts had
been adduced in an open hearing before a duly authorized Trial Ex-
aminer of the Board; (4) the stipulation, complaint, notice of hearing,
and answer constitute the entire record upon which the Board may
make its findings as to the matters alleged in the complaint; (5) the
stipulation constitutes the entire agreement of the parties in this
matter, and they have entered into no other stipulations or collateral
agreements; and (6) the parties request permission to file briefs herein
with the Board in Washington, D.C., and that they be given until
October 5, 1959, to do so. On October 5, the Respondent filed a brief
with the Board.'
On October 6, 1959, the Board issued an Order approving the stip-
ulation and making it a part of the record and transferring this
proceeding to and continuing it before the Board, for the purpose of
making findings of fact and conclusions of law and issuing a Decision
and Order.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the Act, the Board
has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-
member panel [Chairman Leedom and Members Rodgers and
Fanning].
Upon the basis of the aforesaid stipulation, the Respondent's brief,
and the entire record in this case, the Board makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE RESPONDENT
The Employer, a Florida corporation with its principal office and
place of business at Miami, Florida, is engaged in the transportation
of oil and gasoline products along intercoastal waterways from Ft.
Pierce, Florida, to Key West, Florida. The Respondent is wholly
owned and controlled by Belcher Oil Company, herein called the Oil
Company, which has its principal office at the same location as the
Respondent. The Board has found,4 and the Respondent admits, that
the Respondent and the Oil Company constitute a single employer
3In its brief, the Respondent requested that the Board dismiss the complaint. For
reasons hereinafter set forth , the request is denied.
A Belcher Towing Company , Case No 12-RC-304, supra.
BELCHER TOWING COMPANY 199
for jurisdictional purposes . As the Oil Company during the past 12
months purchased more than $100 ,000 worth of petroleum products
which were shipped to it from points outside Florida, we find that
the Respondent is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the
Act, and that it will effectuate the policies of the Act to assert jurisdic-
tion over the Respondent 's operations.'
II. THE LABOR ORGANIZATION INVOLVED
The Union is a labor organization which admits to membership
employees of the Respondent.
III. THE UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
A. The sequence of events
On August 20, 1958, the Board issued its Decision and Direction of
Election in Belcher Towing Company, Case No. 12-RC-304, supra,
directing an election among all unlicensed tugboat employees working
out of the Respondent's headquarters at Miami, Florida, and out of
Port Everglades, Florida, including deckhands (otherwise called
"mates"), cooks, and enginemen, but excluding captains and super-
visors as defined in the Act. On September 10 and 12, 1958, the
election was held. The tally of ballots shows that 18 ballots were
cast, of which 8 were for, and 6 were against, the Union, and 4 were
challenged.' As the challenged ballots-those of Lawson, Siefert,
Sharpe, and MacNeal-were sufficient in number to affect the results
of the election, the Regional Director investigated these ballots. In
his report on challenged ballots, he recommended that all four chal-
lenges be sustained, and that the Board certify the Union as the
exclusive bargaining representative of the employees in the unit
found appropriate by the Board in the Decision and Direction of
Election. The Respondent filed timely exceptions to these recom-
mendations. On January 19, 1959, the Board issued its Supplemental
Decision and Certification of Representatives in Case No. 12-RC-304.'
In that decision, a majority of the Board (1) found that Lawson,
Siefert, and Sharpe were ineligible to vote in the election and sus-
tained the challenges to their ballots; (2) found it unnecessary to
rule on the challenge to the remaining ballot (MacNeal's), as the
Board had already sustained three of the four challenges and as
MacNeal's ballot therefore could not affect the results of the elec-
tion; and (3) certified the Union as the collective-bargaining repre-
sentative of the employees in the unit previously found appropriate.
Thereafter, on or about January 27, 1959, the Union requested the
5 Siemons Maffing Service, 122 NLRB 81.
9 All the challenged ballots were challenged by the Union.
4122 NLRB 1019.
200 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent to bargain with it as the collective-bargaining representa-
tive of the employees in the appropriate unit, with respect to wages,
rates of pay, hours of employment, and other conditions of employ-
ment. On or about January 30, 1959, the Respondent refused to bar-
gain as requested, and it still refuses to do so.
B. Cori tentions and conclusions
The Respondent contends that its refusal to bargain did not violate
Section 8(a) (5) or (1) of the Act, on the ground, in substance, that
the record in Case No. 12-RC-304 fails to disclose that the Union
received a majority of the valid votes cast among the employees in
a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within
the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. In support of its contention,
the Respondent asserts that the Board erred (1) in its Decision and
Direction of Election in Case No. 12-RC-304 in excluding captains
from the appropriate unit; (2) in its Supplemental Decision and
Certification of Representatives in that case in sustaining the chal-
lenges to the ballots of Lawson, Siefert, and Sharpe; and (3) in said
Supplemental Decision in failing to overrule the challenge to the
remaining ballot-MacNeal's. As to (1), nothing new has been pre-
sented as to the unit placement of captains that has not been pre-
viously considered by the Board. As to (2), nothing new has been
presented as to the status of these employees on the eligibility date
(August 16, 1958), which date is significant for purposes of deter-
mining eligibility to vote. As to (3), as noted above, the Board in
its Supplemental Decision found it unnecessary to rule on the chal-
lenge to MacNeal's ballot for the reason that the Board had sustained
the remaining three challenges, and MacNeal's ballot could not affect
the results of the election. As we adhere to our ruling on the other
three ballots, it remains unnecessary to consider the challenge to Mac-
Neal's ballot.
We therefore reject the Respondent's contention, and find that at
the time of the Respondent's refusal to bargain with the Union, it
represented a majority of the Respondent's employees in the following
appropriate unit : All unlicensed tugboat employees working out of
the Respondent's headquarters at Miami, Florida, and out of Port
Everglades, Florida, including deckhands (otherwise called "mates"),
cooks, and enginemen, but excluding captains and supervisors as de-
fined in the Act. We find that by refusing to bargain collectively with
the Union, as aforesaid, on and after January 30, 1959, the Respondent
has violated and is violating Section 8(a) (5) of the Act, and that by
thus interfering with, restraining, and coercing its employees in the
exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act, the Re-
spondent also violated Section 8 (a) (1) thereof.
BELCHER TOWING COMPANY 201
IV. THE EFFECT OF THE UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES ON COMMERCE
The activities of the Respondent set forth above, occurring in con-
nection with the operations of the Respondent described herein, have
a close, intimate, and substantial relation to trade, traffic, and com-
merce among the several States, and tend to lead to labor disputes
burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of commerce.
V. THE REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent had engaged in and is engaging
in unfair labor practices, we shall order that it cease and desist there-
from and take certain affirmative action designed to effectuate the
policies of the Act.
As set forth herein, it has been found that, following a Board-
directed election in which a majority of the Respondent's employees
in the appropriate unit selected the Union as their collective-
bargaining representative, the Board certified the Union as such repre-
sentative, and that the Respondent refused to bargain with the Union.
Accordingly, we shall order that the Respondent, upon request,
bargain with the Union as the exclusive representative of the employ-
ees in the appropriate unit.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The Respondent, Belcher Towing Company, is engaged in com-
merce within the meaning of the Act.
2. Seafarers' International Union of North America, Atlantic &
Gulf District, Harbor & Inland Waterways Division, AFL-CIO, is
a labor organization within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.
3. All the Respondent's unlicensed tugboat employees working out
of its headquarters at Mianmi, Florida, and out of Port Everglades,
Florida, including deckhands (otherwise called "mates"), cooks, and
enginemen, but excluding captains and supervisors as defined in the
Act, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bar-
gaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act.
4. The aforesaid labor organization was on January 27, 1959, and at
all times thereafter, has been the exclusive representative of all
employees in the appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bar-
gaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act.
5. By refusing to bargain collectively with the aforesaid labor
organization as the exclusive representative of the Respondent's
employees in the appropriate unit with respect to wages, rates of
pay, hours of employment, and other conditions of employment, the
Respondent has engaged in and is engaging in unfair labor practices
within the meaning of Section 8(a) (5) of the Act.
202 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
6. By interfering with, restraining , and coercing its employees in
the exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act, the
Respondent has engaged in and is engaging in unfair labor practices
within the meaning of Section 8 (a) (1) of the Act.
7. The aforesaid unfair labor practices affect commerce within the
meaning of Section 2( 6) and (7) of the Act.
ORDER
Upon the entire record in this case, and pursuant to Section 10(c)
of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor
Relations Board hereby orders that the Respondent, Belcher Towing
Company, Miami, Florida, its officers, agents, successors, and assigns,
shall :
1. Cease and desist from :
(a) Refusing to bargain collectively with Seafarers' International
Union of North America, Atlantic & Gulf District, Harbor & Inland
Waterways Division, AFL-CIO, as the exclusive representative of all
its employees in the following appropriate unit with respect to wages,
rates of pay, hours of employment, and other conditions of employ-
ment: All unlicensed tugboat employees working out of the Respond-
ent's headquarters at Miami, Florida, and out of Port Everglades,
Florida, including deckhands (otherwise called "mates"), cooks, and
enginemen, but excluding captains and supervisors as defused in the
Act.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with the efforts of
Seafarers' International Union of North America, Atlantic & Gulf
District, Harbor & Inland Waterways Division, AFL-CIO, to bargain
collectively.
2. Take the following affirmative action which the Board finds will
effectuate the policies of the Act:
(a) Upon request, bargain collectively with Seafarers' Interna-
tional Union of North America, Atlantic & Gulf District, Harbor &
Inland Waterways Division, AFL-CIO, as the exclusive representa-
tive of all the employees in the aforesaid unit with respect to wages,
rates of pay, hours of employment, and other conditions of employ-
ment, and, if an agreement is reached, embody such understanding in
a signed agreement.
(b) Post in conspicuous places at its headquarters at Miami,
Florida, and at its place of business at Port Everglades, Florida, in-
cluding all places where notices to employees are customarily posted,
copies of the notice attached hereto marked "Appendix." a Copies of
8 In the event that this Order is enforced by a decree of a United States Court of
Appeals, there shall be substituted for the words "Pursuant to a Decision and Order" the
words "Pursuant to a Decree of the United States Court of Appeals , Enforcing an Order."
BELCHER TOWING COMPANY 203
said notice , to be furnished by the Regional Director for the Twelfth
Region, shall , after being duly signed by the Respondent 's repre-
sentative , be posted by it immediately upon receipt thereof, and main-
tained by it for at least 60 consecutive days thereafter . Reasonable
steps shall be taken by the Respondent to insure that said notices are
not altered , defaced, or covered by any other material.
(c) Notify the Regional Director for the Twelfth Region, in writ-
ing, within 10 days from the date of this Order, what steps the Re-
spondent has taken to comply herewith.
APPENDIX
NOTICE
Pursuant to a Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations
Board, and in order to effectuate the policies of the National Labor
Relations Act, we hereby notify our employees that :
WE WILL NOT refuse to bargain collectively with Seafarers'
International Union of North America, Atlantic & Gulf District,
Harbor & Inland Waterways Division , AFL-CIO , as the ex-
clusive representative of all our employees in the appropriate unit
with respect to wages, rates of pay, hours of employment, and
other conditions of employment.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere with the
efforts of Seafarers ' International Union of North America, At-
lantic & Gulf District , Harbor & Inland Waterways Division,
AFL-CIO, to bargain collectively.
WE WILL, upon request, bargain collectively with Seafarers'
International Union of North America, Atlantic & Gulf District,
Harbor & Inland Waterways Division , AFL-CIO , as the exclu-
sive representative of all employees in the following bargaining
unit with respect to wages, rates of pay, hours of employment,
and other conditions of employment , and, if an understanding is
reached, embody such understanding in a signed agreement. The
bargaining unit is:
All our unlicensed tugboat employees working out of our head-
quarters at Miami, Florida, and out of Port Everglades , Florida,
including deckhands ( otherwise called "mates"), cooks, and engine-
men, but excluding captains and supervisors as defined in the Act.
BELCHER TOWING COMPANY,
Employer.
Dated---------------- By-------------------------------------
(Representative ) ( Title)
This notice must remain posted for 60 days from the date hereof,
and must not be altered , defaced, or covered by any other material.