Bee Machine

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jan 16, 1945

60 N.L.R.B. 77 (N.L.R.B. 1945)

In the Matter of BEE MACHINE and UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND
MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, C. I. O. ,
Case No. 1-R-2099.-Decided January 16, 19/5
Mr. Henry Vise, of Boston, Mass ., for the Company.
Mr. Donald H. Tormey, of Boston, Mass., and Mr. David P. Ben-
nett, of Lynn, Mass., for the Union.
Mr. Sidney Grossman , of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon an amended petition duly filed by the United Electrical, Ra-
dio and Machine Workers of America, C. I. 0., herein called the
Union, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen con-
cerning the representation of employees of Bee Machine, Lynn, Mas-
sachusetts, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations
Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before
Samuel G. Zack, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held -at Lynn,
Massachusetts, on October 5, November 24, and December 11, 1944.
The Company and the Union appeared and participated. All parties
were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-
examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues.
Subsequent to the initial hearing on October 5, 1944, the Union made
a motion to reopen the record for the purpose of adducing additional
evidence regarding the operations of the Company.-' At the recon-
vened hearing, the Union moved the Board to permit it to withdraw
its motion to reopen the record, and the Company thereupon with-
' At the hearing , the parties agreed to amend the petition and all other formal papers in
this proceeding so that the name of the Company would read "Bee Machine "
z The Union predicated its motion upon ,the fact that approximately 1 month after the
initial hearing, the Company transferred the assets of that portion of its shoe die business
relating to the manufacture of clicker dies to the Atlas Die Company located at a different
address. The employees engaged in the production of such dies for the Company are now
employed by the Atlas Die Company.
60 N. L. R. B., No. 15.
77 .
78 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
drew its objection to the unit proposed by the Union. Ruling was
reserved for the Board. The Union's motion is hereby granted. The
Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudi-
cial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded an op-
portunity to file briefs with the Board.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Vincent W. Burke, the sole proprietor of a business conducted as
Bee Machine, at Lynn, Massachusetts, is engaged in the manufacture
of shoe dies, jigs, fixtures, and screw machine parts. The Company's
annual sales of finished products aggregate approximately $475,000,,
of which approximately 26 percent is for the account of customers
located outside the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. A substantial
portion of the Company's finished products is sold to companies within
the State for use in the manufacture of products for war purposes.
We find, contrary to the Company's contention, that it is engaged
in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.
II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED
United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, affili-
ated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations , is a labor organ-
ization admitting to membership employees of the Company.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
The Company has refused to grant recognition to the Union as the
exclusive bargaining representative of its employees until the Union
has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit.
A statement of a Board agent, introduced into evidence at the hear-
ing, indicates that the Union represents a substantial number of em-
ployees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate.3
We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
The Union requests a unit consisting of all- production and mainte-
nance employees of the Company, including stockroom and shipping-
3 The Field Examiner reported that the Union submitted 28 membership cards, all of
which appeared on the Company 's pay roll for the week ending September 6, 1944 , and that
27 cards were dated in August 1944 , and 1 card was undated . There are 44 employees in
the alleged appropriate unit On September 8, 1944, the American Federation of Labor
was requested in writing to submit representation evidence , but has failed to do so.
BEE MACHINE 79
room employees, but excluding office clerical employees, sales people,
watchmen, assistant foremen, and all other supervisory employees.
The Company generally does not oppose the appropriateness of the
foregoing unit, and takes no definite position with respect to the spe-
cific composition thereof.
We find that all production and maintenance employees of the Com-
pany, at Lynn, Massachusetts, including stockroom and shipping-
Ioom employees, but excluding office clerical employees, sales 'people,
watchmen, assistant foremen, and all or any other supervisory -em-
ployees with authority to hire; promote, discharge, discipline, or
otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively
recommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the pur-
poses of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b)
of the Act.
V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
We shall direct that the question concerning representation which
has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em-
ployees in the appropriate .unit who were employed during the pay-
roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Elec-
tion herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the
Direction.
There is some question concerning the eligibility of certain em-
ployees. The Company employs a carpenter and an electrician who.
perform minor repair jobs in the evening after the regular employees
have left the plant. These employees report to work irregularly, do,
not work under conditions similar to that of other employees in the
plant, and have regular employment elsewhere during the day.
Several employees are also employed who work periodically, but regu-
larly during such weeks as they are not required to report to the
day-shift at other plants with which they have employment, and al-
though they do not work a full day because of their dual employment,
are otherwise accorded the same treatment as the other regular em-
ployees. In addition, the Company employs several high school stu-
dents who have full-time employment with it during the summer,
but at present work regularly as part-time employees under the
same working conditions as the other regular employees. In view
of the regularity, of the part-time high school students and, of the
part-time employees who work periodically, we find that- they have
sufficient interest in the present election to entitle them to a voice
in the choice of a bargaining representative. However, we find that
the dissimilarity in interests of the part-time carpenter and part-
time electrician warrants their exclusion from the group of em-
ployees eligible to vote in the election hereinafter directed.
80 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National
Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela-
tions Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor
Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is
hereby
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa-
tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Bee Machine,
Lynn, Massachusetts , an election by secret ballot shall be conducted
as early as possible , but not later than thirty ( 30) days from the date
,of this Direction , under the direction and supervision of the Regional
Director for the First Region, acting in this matter as agent for the
National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections-
10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations , among the employees in
the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were em-
ployed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date
,of this Direction , including all regular part-time employees and em-
ployees who did not work during the said pay -roll period because they
were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees.
in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in
person at the polls, but excluding any who have since quit or been
discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to
the date of the election , to determine whether or not they desire
to be represented by United Electrical , Radio -and- Machine Workers
.of America , C. I. 0., for the purposes of collective bargaining.