Barry L. Goodson, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 14, 2004
05a40073 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 14, 2004)

05a40073

04-14-2004

Barry L. Goodson, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Barry L. Goodson v. USPS

05A40073

April 14, 2004

.

Barry L. Goodson,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Request No. 05A40073

Appeal No. 01A04529

Agency No. 4-C-170-0056-98

Hearing No. 170-99-8250X

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

The complainant initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the decision in Barry

L. Goodson v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01A04529

(June 7, 2002). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in

its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision where the

requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved

a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2)

the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

By regulation, requests for reconsideration must be filed within thirty

(30) calendar days after the party receives the previous decision.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b). Where complainant is represented by an

attorney, the 30-day time period shall be calculated from the date the

attorney received the document. 29 C.F. R. � 1614.402(b). A document

is timely if it is received or postmarked before the expiration of the

applicable filing period or, in the absence of a legible postmark, if it

is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable

filing period. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(b).

It is noted that the Commission's previous decision included a Certificate

of Mailing indicating that, for purposes of timeliness, the Commission

will presume that the decision was received within five (5) calendar

days of the date on which it was mailed, June 7, 2002. Complainant's

attorney is presumed to have received the previous decision no later

than Wednesday, June 12, 2002. The decision was mailed to the addresses

of both complainant and the attorney as presented in the appeal. On

October 10, 2003, complainant's attorney indicated that he did not

receive the decision until May 28, 2003, in response to an inquiry he

had made. As evidenced by the post mark date, complainant's attorney

filed the request for reconsideration on October 10, 2003, which was

beyond the 30-day limit set by regulation, even assuming the May 28,

2003 date of receipt is used.

For the foregoing reasons, the Complainant's request for

reconsideration is denied. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A04529

remains the Commission's final decision. There is no further right of

administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request

for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 14, 2004

__________________

Date