Barbara J. Bentley, Appellant,v.Andrew M. Cuomo, Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 11, 1999
05971016 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 11, 1999)

05971016

06-11-1999

Barbara J. Bentley, Appellant, v. Andrew M. Cuomo, Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Agency.


Barbara J. Bentley v. Department of Housing and Urban Development

05971016

June 11, 1999

Barbara J. Bentley, )

Appellant, )

) Request No. 05971016

v. ) Appeal No. 01964939

)

Andrew M. Cuomo, )

Secretary, )

Department of Housing and )

Urban Development, )

Agency. )

)

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

On August 29, 1997, the Department of Housing and Urban Development

(hereinafter referred to as the agency) initiated a request to the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission (the Commission) to reconsider the

decision in Barbara J. Bentley v. Andrew M. Cuomo, Secretary, Department

of Housing and Urban Development, EEOC Appeal No. 01964939 (July 28,

1997), received by the agency on July 30, 1997. EEOC regulations provide

that the Commissioners may, in their discretion, reconsider any previous

Commission decision. 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(a). The party requesting

reconsideration must submit written argument or evidence which tends to

establish one or more of the following three criteria: new and material

evidence is available that was not readily available when the previous

decision was issued, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(1); the previous decision

involved an erroneous interpretation of law, regulation, or material fact,

or a misapplication of established policy, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(2);

and the decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(3).

After a review of the agency's request for reconsideration, the

previous decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the

agency's request does not meet the criteria in 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c).

Therefore, it is the decision of the Commission to deny the agency's

request.<1> The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01964939 (July 28, 1997)

remains the Commission's final decision. The agency shall comply with

the provisions of the Order set forth below. There is no further right

of administrative appeal on a decision of the Commission on this Request

for Reconsideration.

ORDER (E1092)

The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded allegations in accordance

with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant

that it has received the remanded allegations within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date the agency receives this decision. The agency shall

issue to appellant a copy of the investigative file and also shall

notify appellant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty

(150) calendar days of the date the agency receives this decision,

unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the

appellant requests a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall

issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of appellant's

request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a copy

of the correspondence that transmits the investigative file and notice

of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some

jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner

suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your

civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision

or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the

jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,

you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR

DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your

appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME

AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY

HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

June 11, 1999

Date Frances M. Hart

Executive Officer

Executive Secretariat

1The agency contended that, since employees were required to report to work

on November 14, 1995, and not released until noon, appellant should have

contacted an EEO Counselor by November 28, 1995. Nevertheless, given the

confusion generated by the furlough and the acknowledged closure of the

agency for part of the day on November 14, the Commission finds that the

previous decision properly determined that appellant's November 29, 1995

contact with the EEO Counselor was timely.