Ashbacker Radio Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsMar 1, 194560 N.L.R.B. 1003 (N.L.R.B. 1945) Copy Citation In the Matter of ASHBACKER RADIO CORPORATION and RADIO BROADCAST TECHNICIANS' LOCAL UNION # 1295 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHER- IIOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS (AFL) Case No. 7-H-1904.-Decided March 1, 1945 Mr. C. N. Sessions, of Muskegon, Mich., for the Company. Mr. Freeman L. Hurd, of Washington, D. C., and Mr. Calvin J. Miller, of Grand Rapids, Mich.,-for the Union. Mr. Benj. E. Cook, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon a petition duly filed by Radio Broadcast Technicians' Local Union #1295 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (AFL), herein called the Union, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Ashbacker Radio Corporation, Muskegon, Michigan, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Cecil Pearl, Trial Ex- aminer. -Said hearing was held at Muskegon, Michigan, on January 31, 1945. The Company and the Union appeared and participated. All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's Rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT . I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Ashbacker Radio Corporation, a Michigan corporation, is engaged, as authorized by the Federal Communications Commission, in the operation of a radio station at Muskegon, Michigan, under the call 60 N. L. R. B., No. 171. 1003 1004 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD letters WKBZ. It is a 250-watt station and its programs have a broad- cast range outside the State of Michigan. It is affiliated with the Mutual Broadcasting System and the Blue Network, national broad- casting organizations which represent two-thirds of the Company's- broadcasting time. Approximately 5, percent of its revenue comes from national advertisers. We find, contrary to its contention, that the Company is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations. Act? II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED Radio Broadcast Technicians' Local Union #1295 of the Interna- tional Brotherhood of Electrical WTorkers, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, is a labor organization admitting to membership, employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Company has refused to grant recognition to the Union as the- exclusive bargaining representative of its technicians until the Union has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit. A statement of a Board agent, introduced into evidence at the hear- ing, indicates that the Union represents a substantial number of em- ployees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate.2 We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of Section, 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Union seeks a unit composed of all technicians employed full time at the Company's transmitter, including the chief engineer, but excluding the control room employees. The. Company contends that an appropriate unit should include all employees of the transmitter and the control room, but excluding the chief engineer. In the conduct of its business, the Company maintains a studio within the city of Muskegon and a broadcasting transmitter outside the city. The control room is in the studio where there are six employees, four of whom are announcers and two announcer-technicians. Duties of the latter two are confined primarily to the control room, although they are occasionally transferred to the transmitter: The transmitter 1 See Consolidated Edison Co v N. L. R. B., 305 U. S. 197, N. L. it. B. v. Central Missouri Telephone Co, 115 F (2d) 563 (C. C A 8) ; Matter of Newark Telephone Com- pany , 59 N L R B 1408 2 The Field-, Examiner reported that the Union submitted five authorization cards, two of which bore signatures of persons listed on the Company's pay roll of December 12, 1944, which contained the names of four employees in the appropriate unit and that the cards were dated October 1944. ASHBACKER RADIO CORPORATION 1005 technicians possess full licenses from the Federal Communications 'Commission and are qualified to operate and repair all of the trans- mitter equipment whereas the announcer-technicians possess a re- stricted Federal license, can make no repairs, and are otherwise limited in` performance of duties connected with the transmitter. We shall therefore exclude the announcer-technicians and all other control room ,employees.' The Union would include the chief engineer and the Company urges his exclusion on the ground of his alleged supervisory position. The record indicates that he is in charge of the transmitter and all technical equipment, assigns and supervises the work of all the technicians, and 'has authority effectively to recommend their hire and discharge. We find that he falls within our customary definition of a'supervisory employee and, accordingly, we shall exclude him.4 We find that all technicians regularly employed at the Company's transmitter but excluding employees of the studio, the chief engineer, and all or any other supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, constitute 'a unit appropriate for the-purposes of collective bargaining within the mean- ing of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em- ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay- roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Elec- tion herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Ashbacker Radio Corporation, Muskegon, Michigan, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Seventh Region, acting in this matter ' See Matter of Colorado Radio Corporation, 55 N L R B 423; Matter of Inter-City Advertising Co, Inc, Operators of WAYS, Charlotte, N C, 55 N L R B 1415. 4 See Matter of Columbus Broadcasting Company, Inc., 56 N L. R. B 211. 1006 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among the em- ployees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding -the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during the said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or tempo- rarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but exclud- ing any who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by the Radio Broadcast Technicians' Local Union #1295 of the International Brotherhood' of Electrical Workers (AFL), for the purposes of collective bargaining. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation