Arthur Newmark, Complainant,v.Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 29, 2004
01a44504_r (E.E.O.C. Oct. 29, 2004)

01a44504_r

10-29-2004

Arthur Newmark, Complainant, v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Arthur Newmark v. Department of Veterans Affairs

01A44504

October 29, 2004

.

Arthur Newmark,

Complainant,

v.

Anthony J. Principi,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A44504

Agency No. 200H-0642-2004102365

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1), on the grounds

of failure to state a claim. On May 16, 2004, complainant filed a formal

EEO complaint wherein he claimed that he was discriminated against on

the bases of his age (52) and in reprisal for his previous EEO activity

under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act when on March 12, 2004,

the agency would not place his rebuttal to a negative proficiency rating

in his official personnel file. Complainant claimed that the agency's

refusal constituted a breach of a settlement agreement. As a remedy,

complainant requested that the agency adhere to the settlement agreement

and insert his rebuttal in his official personnel file.

The record reveals that on October 17, 2003, complainant and the agency

entered into a settlement of a civil action filed by complainant.

A provision in the settlement agreement states in relevant part:

Within ten (10) calendar days after counsel for [Complainant]

receives the Settlement amount, [Complainant] may submit a concise

written response/rebuttal of his proficiency report for the period

March 31, 1996 to March 31, 1997 to . . . Director, [Agency] Medical

Center of Philadelphia. [Complainant] shall also submit a copy of said

response/rebuttal to counsel for Defendants at that time. [Agency] will

cause to be filed [Complainant's] response/rebuttal in his Official

Personnel Folder.

The agency determined in its final action that the complaint failed

to state a claim since jurisdiction over this matter resides with the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

The agency further determined that the complaint represents a collateral

attack on a decision made in and under the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Upon review of complainant's

appeal, we observe that complainant states that he is not seeking to

attack a decision, but rather enforce an agreement. It is evident

that the agreement to which he refers is the settlement agreement that

resolved the civil action. The Commission finds that enforcement of this

settlement agreement should be pursued through the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and not through the EEO

administrative process. Therefore, we find that the Commission does

not have jurisdiction to enforce the civil action settlement agreement.

Accordingly, the agency's decision dismissing the complaint on the

grounds of failure to state a claim is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 29, 2004

__________________

Date