01A32148
06-17-2003
Arthur L. Card v. United States Postal Service
01A32148
06-17-03
.
Arthur L. Card,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A32148
Agency No. 1C441000103
DECISION
Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was
improperly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), due to an
untimely filing of the formal complaint. In his complaint, complainant
alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on the basis of reprisal
for prior EEO activity when he was issued a Notice of Removal that was
reduced to a sixty (60) day suspension. The Supervisor and Concurring
Official who initiated the removal cited complainant for (1) conduct
unbecoming a postal employee, (2) failure to operate a postal vehicle
in a safe manner, (3) failure to follow proper safety procedures,
(4) failure to maintain regular work schedule and (5) absence without
official leave. According to the agency, these charges were reduced
to a 60 day suspension because issues (4) and (5) were not properly
addressed between management and complainant.
On January 27, 2003, the agency issued a decision dismissing the complaint
on the grounds that it was untimely filed. The agency determined
that complainant received the Notice of Right to File a Discrimination
Complaint on December 18, 2002, but waited more than fifteen days before
filing the complaint on January 6, 2003. The regulation set forth at 29
C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) states, in pertinent part, that an agency shall
dismiss a complaint which fails to comply with the applicable time limits
contained in 29 C.F.R. � 1614.106, which, in turn, requires the filing
of a formal complaint within fifteen (15) days of receiving notice of
the right to do so.
EEOC Regulations provide that a document shall be considered timely if
it is received or postmarked before the expiration of the applicable
filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(b). In the absence of a legible
postmark, a document must be received by mail within five days of the
expiration of the filing period to be deemed timely. While the record
does confirm the date the complainant received the Notice of Right to
File on December 18, 2002, the record contains no evidence to support
the agency's decision that the complainant's complaint was postmarked
on January 6, 2003. The complaint itself is stamped as received by
the agency on January 7, 2003, but there is no accompanying postmark or
any other indication of when the complaint was sent by the complainant.
Where, as here, there is an issue of timeliness, "[a]n agency always bears
the burden of obtaining sufficient information to support a reasoned
determination as to timeliness." Guy, v. Department of Energy, EEOC
Request No. 05930703 (January 4, 1994) (quoting Williams v. Department of
Defense, EEOC Request No. 05920506 (August 25, 1992)). In addition, in
Ericson v. Department of the Army, EEOC Request No. 05920623 (January 14,
1993), the Commission stated that �the agency has the burden of providing
evidence and/or proof to support its final decisions.� See also Gens
v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05910837 (January 31, 1992).
Therefore, we find the agency's dismissal of the complaint as untimely
filed is not supported by the record and is improper.
Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss the complaint is hereby
REVERSED. The complaint is REMANDED to the agency for further processing
in accordance with this decision and the Order below.
ORDER (E0900)
The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with
29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant
that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar
days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue
to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify
complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)
calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter
is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a
final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision
within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a
copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of
rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The
report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to
the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's
order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement
of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the
right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's
order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.
See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).
Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on
the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled
"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.
A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying
complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)
(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the
administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for
enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)
This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date
that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a
civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date
you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the
Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in
the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department
head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
___06-17-03_______________
Date