0120070596
10-18-2007
Art Vargas, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Art Vargas,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120070596
Agency No. 4F900026306
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the
agency's decision dated October 4, 2006, dismissing his complaint of
unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �
791 et seq. In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected
to discrimination on the basis of disability (back injury) when:
1. on July 5, 2006, complainant received a request for a medical
assessment of his ability to perform various duties; and
2. on or around the same date his request for a reasonable accommodation
was ignored and hence denied.
We note initially that the FAD addressed only claim 1. A review of
the Formal and Informal Complaints, however, reveals that complainant
also raised additional allegations of discrimination, all of which are
more appropriately and accurately consolidated as above in claim 2.
In the FAD, the agency found that complainant's Formal Complaint was
untimely and dismissed the complaint. In its appeal brief, the agency
also argues that complainant's appeal should be dismissed as untimely.
The agency argues that complainant received the FAD on October 7, 2006 but
did not file his appeal until November 14, 2006. Complainant, however,
has shown that he mailed his appeal on November 6, 2006. Accordingly,
his appeal is timely.
The agency determined that complainant received the Notice of Right to
File a Discrimination Complaint (hereinafter "Notice") on September 7,
2006, as confirmed by the Postal Service Track and Confirm computerized
tracking system, but that complainant waited more than fifteen days to
file the formal complaint.
Based on a thorough review of the record and consideration of the
arguments on appeal, the Commission concludes that the dismissal,
due to the untimely filing of the formal complaint, was improper.
The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) states, in
pertinent part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint which fails to
comply with the applicable time limits contained in 29 C.F.R. � 1614.106,
which, in turn, requires the filing of a formal complaint within fifteen
(15) days of receiving the notice of the right to do so.
The record in this case contains insufficient evidence reflecting
complainant's receipt of the Notice on September 7, 2006. The record
contains a United States Postal Service "Track & Confirm" print-out,
which indicates a delivery on September 7, 2006 in "Los Angeles, CA 90016"
without any further details of the address. We determine that there is
no evidence, other than this generalized reference to a city and zip code,
indicating that complainant actually received the Notice. Where, as here,
there is an issue of timeliness, "[a]n agency always bears the burden of
obtaining sufficient information to support a reasoned determination as
to timeliness." Guy, v. Department of Energy, EEOC Request No. 05930703
(January 4, 1994) (quoting Williams v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request
No. 05920506 (August 25, 1992)). In addition, in Ericson v. Department
of the Army, EEOC Request No. 05920623 (January 14, 1993), the Commission
stated that "the agency has the burden of providing evidence and/or proof
to support its final decisions." See also Gens v. Department of Defense,
EEOC Request No. 05910837 (January 31, 1992).
As it is undisputed that complainant filed his formal complaint on
September 26, 2006, and there is inadequate evidence of complainant's
receipt of the Notice, we find complainant's formal complaint was timely
filed. The agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint
on the grounds that it was untimely filed is REVERSED. The complaint
is REMANDED to the agency for further processing in accordance with this
decision and the ORDER below.
ORDER (E0900)
The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with
29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant
that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar
days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue
to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify
complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)
calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter
is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a
final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision
within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a
copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of
rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar
days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall
be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington,
D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting documentation,
and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the complainant.
If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the complainant
may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �
1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a civil action
to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following
an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407,
1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant
has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in
accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File a Civil
Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for
enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject
to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).
If the complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of
the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the
policies, practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)
This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date
that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a
civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date
you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the
Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant
in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department
head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
The record discloses that the notice of right to file a formal complaint
was delivered to complainant's address of record on September 7, 2006.
Although the notice indicated that complainant had to file a formal
complaint within fifteen (15) calendar days of its receipt, complainant
did not file his formal complaint until September 26, 2006, which is
beyond the limitation period. On appeal, complainant has not offered
adequate justification to warrant an extension of the time limit for
filing the complaint. Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing
complainant's complaint is affirmed.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court
appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you
to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security.
See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �
2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��
791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole
discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not
extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and
the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the
paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
October 18, 2007
__________________
Date
2
0120070596
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P. O. Box 19848
Washington, D.C. 20036
5
0120070596