Armandov.Marquez, Complainant, v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Department of Justice, (Immigration and Naturalization Service), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 18, 2002
05A21257 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 18, 2002)

05A21257

11-18-2002

Armando V. Marquez, Complainant, v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Department of Justice, (Immigration and Naturalization Service), Agency.


Armando V. Marquez v. Department of Justice

05A21257

November 18, 2002

.

Armando V. Marquez,

Complainant,

v.

John Ashcroft,

Attorney General,

Department of Justice,

(Immigration and Naturalization Service),

Agency.

Request No. 05A21257

Appeal No. 01A03118

Agency No. I-98-C067

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Armando V. Marquez (complainant) timely initiated a request to the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the

decision in Armando V. Marquez v. Department of Justice, EEOC Appeal

No. 01A03118 (August 14, 2002). EEOC Regulations provide that the

Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission

decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact

or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on

the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. �

1614.405(b).

In the underlying complaint, complainant alleged that he was discriminated

against on the basis of his national origin (Hispanic) in violation of

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42

U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and on the basis of his age (D.O.B. April 14,

1947) in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967

(ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq., when he was not selected

for an Acting Supervisory Special Agent position.

In the previous decision, the Commission affirmed the agency's final

decision that complainant failed to establish by a preponderance of the

evidence, that the agency discriminated against him on the alleged bases.

In his request for reconsideration, complainant again recites his version

of the facts and restates arguments previously made. Complainant contends

that the agency's reasons are pretextual.

After a review of complainant's request for reconsideration, the previous

decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request

fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the

decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC

Appeal No. 01A03118 remains the Commission's final decision. There is no

further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission

on this request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 18, 2002

__________________

Date