01975299
03-04-1999
Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast/Southwest Agency.
Dutchess D. Williams v. United States Postal Service
01975299
March 4, 1999
Dutchess D. Williams,
Appellant,
v.
William J. Henderson,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
(Southeast/Southwest
Agency.
Appeal No. 01975299
Agency No. 1H-1865-93
Hearing No. 250-95-8084X
DECISION
Appellant timely initiated an appeal to the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (Commission or EEOC) from a final agency decision (FAD)
concerning her allegation that the agency discriminated against her on
the basis of race (African American), when she was not converted from a
Transitional Employee (TE) status to a Part-time Flexible (PTF) position,
in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. The Commission hereby accepts the appeal
in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960.001. For the following reasons,
the FAD is AFFIRMED.
At the time of the alleged discriminatory event, appellant was employed
as a TE Distribution Clerk at the agency's Processing and Distribution
Plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Believing that she was the victim
of discrimination, appellant sought EEO counseling and, thereafter,
filed a formal EEO complaint. The agency accepted the complaint for
investigation and complied with all of our procedural and regulatory
prerequisites. Subsequently, appellant requested a hearing before
an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ), which was held on June 25, 1996.
Thereafter, the AJ issued a Recommended Decision (RD) finding no
discrimination. In his RD, the AJ concluded that while appellant
established a prima facie case of race discrimination,<1> she failed
to show that the agency's actions were pretextual. Specifically, the
AJ reasoned that appellant failed to rebut the agency's legitimate,
nondiscriminatory reason for not converting her to a PTF position.
Thereafter, the agency adopted the RD and issued a FAD, dated June 5,
1997, finding no discrimination. It is from this agency decision that
appellant now appeals. No contentions were submitted on appeal.
The investigative record reveals that appellant, as well as two
comparative TEs not in her protected group, failed to achieve passing
scores on the requisite training scheme. Neither appellant nor the
other two TEs were converted to PTF status. Finally, appellant failed
to show that the agency denied her conversion for any reason other than
her failure meet the testing requirements of the PTF positions.
After careful review of the entire record, including appellant's
contentions on appeal, and arguments and evidence not specifically
addressed in this decision, the Commission finds that the AJ's RD
sets forth the relevant facts, and properly analyzes the appropriate
regulations, policies and laws. The Commission discerns no basis to
disturb the AJ's finding. Accordingly, the FAD is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests
for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � l6l4.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)
It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file
a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN
NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.
You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have
interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that
a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from
the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil
action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY
(30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or
to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the
jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil
action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON
WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT
PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may
result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department"
means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or
department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the
administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
March 4, 1999 ___________________________
Date Ronnie Blumenthal, Director
Office of Federal Operations
1We note that the parties stipulated that appellant had established a
prima facie case of discrimination.