Anthony A. Barrett, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Great Lakes Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 12, 2011
0120093005 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 12, 2011)

0120093005

08-12-2011

Anthony A. Barrett, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Great Lakes Area), Agency.




Anthony A. Barrett,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Great Lakes Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120093005

Agency No. 1J-601-0012-09

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated May 18, 2009, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that Complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1) for failure

to state a claim.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as a Postage Due Clerk at the Agency’s Processing and Distribution

Center in Carol Stream, Illinois. On May 2, 2009, Complainant filed an

EEO complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination

on the basis of race (African-American) when:

1. On March 19, 2009, he was paged while on lunch about a tray of mail;

2. On March 20 and 21, 2009, he was paged while on lunch;

3. On March 21 and 28, 2009, he was ordered to handle mail in an incorrect

manner; and,

4. On April 26, 2009, his supervisor (S1) checked on him.

The Agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1)

for failure to state a claim. The Agency determined that Complainant was

not aggrieved as he failed to show that he suffered a loss or harm with

respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment. Further,

the Agency found that the alleged incidents were common workplace

occurrences and were not sufficiently severe or pervasive to state a

claim of actionable harassment. As a result, the Agency dismissed the

complaint for failure to state a claim.

On appeal, Complainant states that he disagrees with the Agency’s

dismissal and alleges that S1 has a history of harassing African-American

employees. Accordingly, Complainant requests that the Commission reverse

the Agency’s dismissal.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under the

EEOC regulations because Complainant failed to show that he suffered harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for

which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Request

No. 05931049 (Apr. 21, 1994). Moreover, the Commission finds that the

incidents, even if proven to be true and viewed in a light most favorable

to Complainant, do not amount to harassment that is sufficiently severe

or pervasive to alter the conditions of employment. See Cobb v. Dep’t

of the Treasury, Request No. 05970077 (Mar. 13, 1997). Accordingly, the

Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See

29 C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (Nov. 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File A Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 12, 2011

Date

2

0120093005

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013