Anna M. Sturgeon, Jeanette S. French, Michelle D. Laign-Robbins, Gail F. Brunjes & Susan S. Whitfield, Complainants,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 18, 2008
01200822922293232123232324 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 18, 2008)

01200822922293232123232324

09-18-2008

Anna M. Sturgeon, Jeanette S. French, Michelle D. Laign-Robbins, Gail F. Brunjes & Susan S. Whitfield, Complainants, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Anna M. Sturgeon, Jeanette S. French, Michelle D. Laign-Robbins,

Gail F. Brunjes & Susan S. Whitfield,

Complainants,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal Nos. 0120082292, 0120082293, 0120082321,

0120082323 & 0120082324

Agency Nos. 4K-230-0031-08, 4K-230-0038-08, 4K-230-0030-08,

4K-230-0035-08 & 4K-230-0037-08

DECISION

Complainants filed timely appeals with this Commission from final

agency decisions dated March 20, 2008, dismissing their complaints of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that their complaints were improperly

dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state

a claim.

During the relevant period, complainants were employed as Rural Carriers

at a Hayes, Virginia facility of the agency. In November 2007, the

complainants initiated EEO contact alleging that the agency subjected

them to hostile work environment harassment when it failed to address

the abusive behavior of a male clerk coworker (C1).

To support their individual claims of harassment, the complainants

alleged: to delay mail delivery, C1 played pranks on them using their

personal belongings (e.g. hid vehicle keys or locked carriers out of

vehicles), hid mail until the last minute, and reorganized mail tubs

so that the carriers would not know the status of each piece of mail;

C1 placed fragile items on tub bottoms under heavier parcels so that

the delicate items would get broken; C1 made insensitive comments to

and/or about carriers and customers; C1 accepted money from carriers for

money orders then indicated the money was missing and blamed a female; C1

overloaded mail bags so that carriers would have to bend unnecessarily; C1

did not relay business or urgent personal messages to carriers; C1 blamed

all mishaps on carriers to customers; C1 caused non-payment or incorrect

payments for the carriers' paychecks; C1 blocked carrier cases with heavy

equipment; and C1 stated that he keeps the work area cold so that he can

watch female nipples or "headlights" and that a female carrier looked

"bend you over the chair good." Further, the complainants stated that,

on October 1, 2007, C1 threw mail tubs across the work room.

In February 2008, the complainants filed individual EEO complaints

alleging that they were subjected to harassment on the basis of sex

(female) based on the October 1 incident. The complainants stated

that the October 1 incident is just one example of C1's consistently

violent behavior.1 Subsequently, the complainants alleged that the agency

retaliated against them, for complaining about C1, when a new Officer-in

Charge (S1) spoke to and treated them in a demeaning manner, threatened

to take their work equipment and to issue unfounded disciplinary actions,

and invited postmasters to stand over the carriers and watch them work

in an intimidating manner. Further, the complainants stated that S1

and the facility Postmaster were well aware of C1's harassing behavior

of the carriers (all of whom are female), but failed to address it.

EEOC regulations require the dismissal of complaints that fail to state a

claim. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). To state a claim, a complainant

must allege harm to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for

which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC

Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Or, hostile work environment

harassment is actionable if it is sufficiently severe or pervasive to

alter the conditions of complainant's employment. See Harris v. Forklift

Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 21 (1993).

After careful review of the record, the Commission determines that taking

all of the complainants' allegations together, and assuming them to

be true, they have alleged a viable claim of hostile work environment

harassment. Moreover, we find that the complainants also assert the

basis of reprisal and that the agency actions alleged were of a type

reasonably likely to deter complainants or others from engaging in

protected activity. As such, we find that the complainants have stated

a claim of harassment based on reprisal. Accordingly, we REVERSE the

final agency decision dismissing complainants' complaints and REMAND

their individual claims of harassment to the agency consistent with this

decision and the Order below.

ORDER

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claim of hostile work

environment harassment for each complainant in accordance with 29

C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainants

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainants a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainants of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainants request a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to the complainants and

a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice

of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0408)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the

Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in

which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 18, 2008

__________________

Date

1 Several complainants noted that, in March 2008, the agency issued

Notice of Removal letters to five of the six initial female carriers who

complained of C1's behavior. The complainants indicated that they filed

separate complaints on that matter. The record suggests that the Notices

followed a "walk out" in response to the complained of harassment.

??

??

??

??

2

0120082321

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

5

0120082292, -2293, -2321, -2323 & -2324