Alvis N. Napier, Complainant,v.Robert M. Gates, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Army & Air Force Exchange Service), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 25, 2007
0520070856 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 25, 2007)

0520070856

09-25-2007

Alvis N. Napier, Complainant, v. Robert M. Gates, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Army & Air Force Exchange Service), Agency.


Alvis N. Napier,

Complainant,

v.

Robert M. Gates,

Secretary,

Department of Defense,

(Army & Air Force Exchange Service),

Agency.

Request No. 0520070856

Appeal No. 0120070353

Hearing No. 350200500120X

Agency No. 4V1C04070

DENIAL

Complainant requested reconsideration of the decision in Alvis N. Napier

v. Army & Air Force Exchange Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0120070353 (December

28, 2006). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its

discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision

where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision

involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

(2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

In the appellate decision, complainant alleged discrimination based

on reprisal (prior EEO activity) when in 2004: (a) on February 13,

she received a letter of reprimand; (b) on April 4, she was told not

to go to the budget area; (c) on April 21, her supervisor yelled at

her for not processing forms; (d) on April 23, her supervisor issued

her a memorandum of record that she was not performing her duties; (e)

on April 26, her job duties as an alternate civilian pay technician were

removed; and (f) on May 17, she was issued an unsatisfactory evaluation.

An EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) issued a summary judgment decision

finding no discrimination. The agency fully implemented the decision.

On appeal, the Commission affirmed the finding of no discrimination.

The Commission has decided to dismiss complainant's request as untimely.

The appellate decision was issued on December 28, 2006. If we assume

that she received it within five days, complainant should have received

it by January 3, 2007. Complainant did not file the present request

for reconsideration until August 17, 2007, which is some 200 plus days

after its due date. We also note that complainant presented no argument

that suggested that extenuating circumstances prevented her from filing

within 30 days of receipt of the EEOC decision. Further, it appears that

complainant in her request for reconsideration is attempting to add the

issue of termination from the agency to her argument. Since this issue

was not addressed in her initial complaint it will not be considered

at this time. Accordingly, the decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120070353

remains the Commission's final decision. There is no further right

of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this

request.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

____9/25/07______________

Date

2

0520070856

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

2

0520070856