Alice M. Lumpkin, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 2, 1999
01980826 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 2, 1999)

01980826

03-02-1999

Alice M. Lumpkin, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Alice M. Lumpkin v. United States Postal Service

01980826

March 2, 1999

Alice M. Lumpkin, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01980826

) Agency No. 1-C-441-0075-97

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

The appellant timely filed an appeal with this Commission from a final

decision, dated October 17, 1997, which the agency issued pursuant to

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a) and (b). The Commission accepts

the appellant's appeal in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960, as amended.

The appellant sought EEO counseling on January 31, 1997, regarding

agency complaint number 1-C-441-0075-97. The appellant alleged that the

limited duty clerk assignment she had been performing since November 23,

1996, had worsened her disability. She also alleged that the agency was

treating her less favorably (based on race, sex, age, physical disability,

and retaliation) than three other employees regarding the provision of

limited duty assignments on a long-term basis. The appellant filed a

formal complaint, dated May 20, 1997, alleging disparate treatment in

the provision of long-term limited duty positions.

The appellant sought EEO counseling again on February 25, 1997, regarding

agency complaint number 1-C-441-0080-97. The record does not contain a

copy of the appellant's "Information for Precomplaint Counseling" form.

The appellant filed a formal complaint, dated April 22, 1997, which

appears to challenge her reassignment to a permanent part-time-flexible

distribution clerk position, effective February 15, 1997.

The agency dismissed the appellant's complaint on the ground that

it stated the same claim (reassignment from a full-time position to

a part-time-flexible position) that was pending before the agency in

agency complaint number 1-C-441-0080-97. Additionally, the agency

dismissed the appellant's complaint on the ground that the appellant

did not timely contact an EEO counselor regarding her reassignment,

effective November 23, 1996.

When asked for a copy of the acceptance letter for agency complaint

number 1-C-441-0080-97, the agency informed the Commission that it was

unavailable because the complaint was part of a class action.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a) requires the dismissal of

allegations that state the same claim that is pending before or has been

decided by the agency or the Commission. The intent of this regulation

is to eliminate duplication of effort when possible. EEOC Regulation

29 C.F.R. �1614.106(d)(2) requires the agency to conduct a complete and

fair investigation within 180 days of the filing of the complaint unless

the parties agree to extend the investigation period. The intent of

this regulation is to ensure the timely and appropriate resolution of

complaints.

It appears that the agency views the two complaints as stating the same

claim because the appellant requests the same remedies in both complaints:

return to her modified city/rural carrier assignment; restoration of her

seniority and other job benefits, monetary damages, and attorney's fees.

However even if the complaints state the same claim, there is no evidence

in the record that the agency has accepted and investigated agency

complaint number 1-C-441-0080-97 as required by Commission regulation.

There also is no evidence that the agency has certified a class complaint

that encompasses the allegations raised in this complaint or that such

a class complaint has even been filed. Lacking any evidence that the

agency is actively processing agency complaint number 1-C-441-0080-97,

the Commission finds that the agency improperly dismissed the instant

complaint on the ground that it states the same claim that is pending

before the agency.

Moreover, it appears that implicit in the instant complaint, when read in

conjunction with the appellant's "Information for Precomplaint Counseling"

form, is an allegation that the agency failed to provide the appellant

with reasonable accommodations for her disabilities once the agency

determined that the appellant's medical restrictions would be permanent.

The instant complaint, when read in conjunction with the appellant's

"Information for Precomplaint Counseling" form, also alleges disparate

treatment, based on race, sex, age, physical disability, and retaliation,

regarding provision of limited duty assignments on a long-term basis.

There is no indication in the record that the appellant raised these

issues in agency complaint number 1-C-441-0080-97. For this additional

reason, the Commission finds that the agency improperly dismissed agency

complaint number 1-C-441-0075-97 on the ground that it states the same

claim that was pending in agency complaint number 1-C-441-0080-97.

The agency also dismissed the appellant's complaint on the ground that

she did not timely contact an EEO counselor regarding the November 23,

1996 detail. The Commission finds that the appellant's complaint does not

contest her November 23, 1996 detail, but rather, raises the allegations

discussed above.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated above, the Commission REVERSES the agency's

dismissal of the appellant's May 20, 1997 complaint and REMANDS the

complaint for processing as ORDERED below.

ORDER (E1092)

The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded allegations in accordance

with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant

that it has received the remanded allegations within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to

appellant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify appellant

of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days

of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise

resolved prior to that time. If the appellant requests a final decision

without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty

(60) days of receipt of appellant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a copy

of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights

must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some

jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner

suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your

civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision

or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the

jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,

you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR

DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your

appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME

AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY

HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

Mar 2, 1999

______________

Date Ronnie Blumenthal, Director

Office of Federal Operations