Alabama By-Products Corporation, Coke Oven DivisionDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJun 28, 193913 N.L.R.B. 427 (N.L.R.B. 1939) Copy Citation In the Matter of ALABAMA BY-PRODUCTS CORPORATION, COKE OVEN DIVISION and DISTRICT 50, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA (C. I. 0.) Case No. R-1319.Decided June 28, 1939 Processing of Coal Byproducts industry-Investigation of Representatives: controversy concerning representation of employees : employer refused to grant recognition of petitioning union until directed to do so by the Board-Contract: no bar to investigation of representatives , where applicable to members only and where petition filed prior to time for renewal-Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : production , maintenance, shipping , and receiving employees, ex- cluding supervisors , foremen, clerks on fixed salaries , stenographers , chemists, samplemen , draftsmen , and timekeepers-Election Ordered Mr. Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., for the Board. Mr. W. W. Bankhead, of Jasper, Ala., and Mr. W. F. Shillito, of Birmingham, Ala., for the Company. Mr. Yelverton Cowherd, of Birmingham , Ala., for District 50. Mr. J. L. Busby, of Birmingham, Ala., for No. 19133. Mr. Roscoe L. Barrow, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE On August 26, 1938, District 50, United Mine Workers of America, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, herein called District 50, filed with the Regional Director for the Tenth Region (Atlanta, Georgia) a petition alleging that a question affecting com- merce had arisen concerning the representation of employees in the Coke Oven Division of Alabama By-Products Corporation, Tarrant, Alabama, herein, called the Company,, and requesting an investigation and certification of representatives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. On March 13, 1939, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act and Article III, Section 3, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 1, as amended , ordered an investigation and 13 N. L R . B., No. 49. 427 428 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD authorized the Regional Director to conduct it and to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice. The Regional Director issued on March 17, 1939, a notice of hearing and on March 29, 1939, an, amended notice of hearing. Copies of the notice and amended notice were duly served upon the Company, District 50, and By-Products Workers Union No. 19133, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, herein called No. 19133. Pur- suant to the notices, a hearing was held on April 13 and 14, 1939, at Birmingham, Alabama, before Earl S. Bellman, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Board. The 'Board, the Company, District 50, and No. 19133 were represented by counsel and participated in the hearing. Full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing upon the issues was af- forded all parties. During the course of the hearing the Trial Exam- iner made several rulings on motions and objections to the admission of evidence. The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Exam- iner and finds that no prejudicial errors were committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Alabama By-Products Corporation is a Delaware corporation having its main office in Birmingham, Alabama. Its Coke Oven Division plant, the only plant with which these proceedings are con- cerned, is located in Tarrant, Alabama. The Coke Oven Division is engaged in the production of coke, coal tar, sulphate of ammonia, benxol , toluol , motor benzol , xyol, and gas. The principal raw mate- rials used in the Company's operations at its Coke Oven Division plant are coal and sulphuric acid. The cost of such raw materials during 1938 was approximately $1,793,000, and the value of the prod- ucts sold during 1938 was approximately $2,646,000. Almost 25 per cent of the raw materials used during 1938 were shipped to the Com- pany from points outside Alabama. During the same period over 51 per cent of the finished products were sold and shipped to points outside Alabama. II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED District 50, United Mine Workers of America, is a labor organi- zation affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, ad- mitting to membership production and maintenance, shipping, and receiving employees, excluding supervisors, foremen, and technical and clerical employees on salaries. ALABAMA BY-PRODUCTS CORPORATION 429 By-Products Workers Union No. 19133 is a labor organization affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to mem- bership all employees in the plant except executives and foremen with authority to employ or discharge. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION District 50 began to. organize the employees in the Tarrant plant on March 14, 1938. On August 24, 1938, it notified the Company that it had attained a majority status and requested that representa- tives of the Company meet with it for the purposes of collective bar- gaining. On August 25, 1938, the Company advised District 50 that it was bound by a contract with No. 19133, and that it would not feel free to bargain with District 50 until directed to do so by the Board. On the following day District 50 filed its petition herein. On September 14, 1938, District 50 cited to the Company .a pro- vision in the Company's contract with No. 19133 which permits indi- viduals or groups not a party to the contract to bargain with the Company concerning his or their interest or welfare, and requested the Company to recognize it as the bargaining agent for its own members until such time as the Board certified one of the unions as representative for all the employees. It'also suggested that a con- sent election be held to decide whether District 50 or No. 19133 had a majority status. The Company replied that it preferred to allow the matter to be handled by the Board. The Company first entered into a contract with No. 19133 on December 1, 1934. The contract ran continuously until December 1, 1937, at which time negotiations for changes in the contract were had, Another contract was entered into on May 1, 1938, which was to run for one year and thereafter, unless one of the parties should request a change 30 days before the renewal date. The contract covers only members of No. 19133. District 50's petition was filed several months before the renewal date of the contract. Under either of these circumstances, the contract is no bar to a determination of representatives at this time by the Board. We find that a question has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company. IV. THE EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION UPON COMMERCE We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen, occurring in connection with the operations of the Company described in Section I above, has a close, intimate, and substantial relation to trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States, 430 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing com- merce and the free flow of commerce. V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT In its petition, District 50 asserts that all production, maintenance, shipping, and receiving employees of the Company, excluding fore- men, supervisors, and office clerks on fixed salaries, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining. At the hear- ing District 50 specifically designated certain employees as those whom it wishes excluded from the appropriate unit. The Company and No. 19133 assert that the unit should consist of all the employees in the Company's Coke Oven Division, except 7 supervisory officials who, admittedly, have authority to hire and discharge., At the hearing a statement prepared by the Company was intro- duced, describing the duties of those employees who District 50 asserts should be excluded from the unit. This statement was supplemented by testimony. From the statement and testimony the following appears : A. E. English, H. S. Milstead, C. A. Anthony, W. D. English, J. W. Hes- ter, E. J. Hubbard, M. E`. Lackey, C. W. Sims, I. S. Sims, T. F. Beery, J. J. Christian, C. W. Broadway, and J. K. Williamson are foremen having no authority to employ or discharge. It appears that they recommend discharge, but an investigation is made before the recommendation is approved or disapproved. It also appears that each has 5 or more men under his direction. L. O. Little, J. E. Murphree, and O. T. Payne collect and prepare samples for the laboratory. R. Gaskins, C. F. Walters, and W. F. Prosch are chem- ists. Y. B. Haynes, W. H. Crawford, E. Chamblis, J. T, Mobley, and T. S. Winn are clerks. V. Winn and I. Buchner are stenogra- phers. C. N. Lee is a mechanical draftsman. C. O. Wright is a timekeeper . With the exception of W. C. Broadway and I. S. Sims, all of these employees are on salary. Where one union desires to exclude employees of the above types from a unit composed of production and maintenance employees, and another does not, it has been the practice of the Board to exclude them,2 unless some special reasons appear for their inclusion. No 1 These employees are A. R. Overton, G. It. Ozley, H. B . Owen, W. M Mobley, T. Sizemore, H. Carder, and L. K. Almon. 'Foremen excluded : Matter of the International Nickel Company , Inc. and Square Deal Lodge No. 40 , Amalgamated Association of Iron, Steel, and Tin Workers of North America, Through Steel Workers Organizing Committee , 11 N. L. R B. 97; Matter or Rea Manufacturing Co., Inc. and A. F. L. Federal Local Union No. 20893, 7 N. L. R. B. 95 Chemists and Samplers excluded : Matter of Interlake Iron Corporation and Amalgamated Association of Iron , Steel, and Tin Workers of North America, Local No 1657, 6 N L. It. B 780; Matter of Armour d Company and Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Work- men of North America, Local Union 413, 5 N. L. It. B . 975. Clerks excluded : Matter of Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company and International Union, United Automobile ALABAMA BY-PRODUCTS CORPORATION 431 such reasons appear in the record as to the employees listed above. In fact, the president of No. 19133 testified that certain foremen who have no authority to employ or discharge, and very probably the chemists, are ineligible for membership in No. 19133. It appears that during the competitive activity of the two unions, No. 19133 signed up a number of these employees, who, according to its presi- dent, were ineligible for membership therein. We shall exclude from the unit the employees named above. District 50 further asserted that L. E. Littleton should be excluded from the unit on the ground'that he is an assistant electrical foreman. The evidence shows that Littleton has no employees working under his direction. It also appears that there are other electricians on the pay roll whom District 50 does not seek to exclude from the unit. We shall include Littleton in the appropriate unit. We find that all the production, maintenance, shipping, and receiv- ing employees of the Company in its Coke Oven Division, excluding supervisors, foremen, clerks on fixed salaries, stenographers, chemists, samplemen, draftsmen, and timekeepers, constitute a unit appro- priate for the purposes of collective bargaining, and that said unit will insure to employees of the Company the full benefit of their right to self-organization and to collective bargaining, and otherwise effectuate the policies of the Act. VI. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES During the hearing District 50 introduced 142 authorization and membership cards. It also introduced 119 authorizations, which were obtained from among members and non-members, indiscrim- inately, within 48 hours preceding the hearing. No. 19133 intro- duced in evidence 116 membership and authorization cards. There are approximately 215 employees on the April 1, 1939, pay roll of the Company at its Coke Oven Division, who are within the appro- priate unit. We find that the question which has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company can best be resolved by holding an election by secret ballot. District 50 stated that in the event of an election, it preferred April 29, 1938, the date on which the Company had notice that Dis- trict 50 was organizing the plant, and No. 19133 stated that it pre- Workers of America Local 248, 4 N. L. It. B. 159; Matter of Walker Vehicle Company and the Automatic Transportation Company, Divisions of the Yale and Towne Manufaetviing Company and Walker-Automatic Independent Labor Association, 7 N L. R B 827. Stenographers excluded : Matter of International Nickel Company, Inc. and Matter of Inter- lake Iron Corporation, supra. Timekeepers excluded: Matter of American Radiator Company (Bond Plant and Terminal Plant) and Amalgamated Association of Iron, Steel d Tin Workers, Lodges 1199, 1629, 7 N. L. R. B. 452; Matter of Atlantic Basin Iron Works and Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, Local No. 13, 6 N. L It. B. 402. 432 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ferred April 13, 1939, the date of the hearing, as the date determin- ing the eligibility of employees to vote therein. Both agreed, how- ever, that any eligibility date selected by the Board would be agreeable to them. We feel that a current eligibility date will best effectuate the policies of the Act. We shall accordingly direct that employees of the Company in its Coke Oven Division within the appropriate unit who were on the Company's pay roll immediately preceding the date of our Direction of Election herein, including employees who did not work during such pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation and excluding those who have since quit or have been discharged for cause, shall be eligible to vote. Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the repre- sentation of employees of Alabama By-Products Corporation at its Coke Oven Division in Tarrant, Alabama, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act. 2. The production, maintenance, shipping, and receiving employees of the Coke Oven Division of the Company, excluding supervisors, foremen, clerks on fixed salaries, stenographers, chemists, samplemen, draftsmen, and timekeepers, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining, within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, 49 Stat. 449, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 1, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation authorized by the Board to ascertain representatives of employees at the Coke Oven Division of the Alabama By-Products Corporation, for the purposes of col- lective bargaining, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Direction of Election under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Tenth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations, among all the production, maintenance, shipping, and receiving employees whose names appear on the Company's Coke ALABAMA BY-PRODUCTS CORPORATION 433 Oven Division pay roll immediately preceding this Direction of Elec- tion, including employees who did not work during such pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation, but excluding super- visors, foremen, clerks on fixed salaries, stenographers, chemists, samplemen, draftsmen, and timekeepers, and all who have since quit or been discharged for cause, to determine whether they desire to be represented for the purposes of collective bargaining by Dis- trict 50, United Mine Workers of America, affiliated with the Con- gress of Industrial Organizations, or by By-Products Workers Union No. 19133, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, or by neither. Mr. WILLIAM M. LEISERSON took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation