Agnes Adams, Complainant,v.Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 30, 2001
01A14446_r (E.E.O.C. Oct. 30, 2001)

01A14446_r

10-30-2001

Agnes Adams, Complainant, v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Agnes Adams v. Department of Veterans Affairs

01A14446

October 30, 2001

.

Agnes Adams,

Complainant,

v.

Anthony J. Principi,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A14446

Agency No. 200H-2186

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint

was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) and

1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO contact and for failure to state a claim.

On March 19, 2001, complainant, a former retired employee of the agency,

filed an EEO complaint alleging that she was discriminated against when:

(1) On March 31, 2000, she retired because her request to

be upgraded to Assistant Chief of Canteen

services at the Syracuse VAMC was denied and she was told to

train a 23 year old Canteen Service Trainee.

(2) In November 2000, she became aware that in August 2000,

the Canteen Service Trainee was appointed as

the Assistant Chief Canteen Service at the Syracuse VAMC.

The agency dismissed claim 1 on the grounds of untimely EEO Counselor

contact, finding that complainant did not contact an EEO Counselor on

the matter raised therein until January 12, 2001, which is beyond the

45- day time limit. The agency dismissed claim 2 for failure to state

a claim. The agency determined that complainant was not an employee

or applicant for employment at the time of the alleged appointment of

the selectee. Accordingly, the agency concluded that complainant was

not aggrieved.

The record discloses that the alleged discriminatory event in claim 1

occurred on March 31, 2000, but complainant did not initiate contact with

an EEO Counselor until January 12, 2001, which is beyond the forty-five

(45) day limitation period. On appeal, no persuasive arguments or

evidence have been presented to warrant an extension of the time limit

for initiating EEO contact. Accordingly, the agency's final decision

dismissing claim 1 in complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

Regarding claim 2, the record discloses that complainant retired from

the agency on March 31, 2000. In November 2000, when complainant learned

that an employee was appointed to the position of Assistant Chief

Canteen Services in August 2000, complainant was neither an employee of

the agency nor was an applicant for that position. The Commission finds

that the agency correctly determined that she was not aggrieved by the

agency's action, as there is no nexus between the alleged discriminatory

event articulated in claim 2 and complainant's former status as an agency

employee. The agency therefore properly dismissed claim 2 for failure

to state a claim. Accordingly, the final agency decision dismissing

the complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 30, 2001

__________________

Date