Abraham et al.v.Kawahara et al. V. Kawahara et al.Download PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesAug 15, 201210979821 (B.P.A.I. Aug. 15, 2012) Copy Citation Paper 27 Mail Stop Interference P.O. Box 1450 Filed August 15, 2012 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Tel: 571-272-4683 Fax: 571-273-0042 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES SHIGERU KAWAHARA, YUSUKE AMINO, KENICHI MORI, NAO FUNAKOSHI, and TADASHI TAKEMOTO Junior Party (Patent 7,064,219 B2 and Patent 7,678,925), v. TIMOTHY W. ABRAHAM, DOUGLAS C. CAMERON, PAULA M. HICKS, SARA C. McFARLAN, JIM MILLIS, JOHN ROSAZZA, LISHAN ZHAO, and DAVID P. WEINER Senior Party (Application 10/979,821). _______________________ Patent Interference No. 105,869 (SGL) (Technology Center 1600) Before: RICHARD SCHAFER, SALLY GARDNER LANE, and SALLY MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges. LANE, Administrative Patent Judge. . Judgment – Request for Adverse – Bd. R. 127(b) . -2- Kawahara has filed a paper requesting adverse judgment as to Count 1 of the interference. (Paper 23.) Abraham has filed a paper requesting adverse judgment as to Count 2 of the interference. (Paper 24.) Each party’s request is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 11 is entered against junior party Kawahara; FURTHER ORDERED that claims 1-10 of Kawahara patent 7,064,219 B2, which claims correspond to Count 1 (105,696, Paper 1 (Declaration) at 7 and Paper 98 (Redeclaration)), are CANCELLED, 35 U.S.C.§135(a); FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 2 is entered against senior party Abraham; FURTHER ORDERED that claim 1932 of Abraham application 10/979,821, which claim corresponds to Count 2 (105,869, Paper 1 (Declaration) at 4), is FINALLY REFUSED, 35 U.S.C.§135(a); FURTHER ORDERED that the parties note the requirements of 35 U.S.C. §135(c) and Bd.R. 205; and FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment shall be entered into the administrative record of the involved Kawahara patents and Abraham application. 1 Count 1 was carried forward from interference 105,696 (Paper 1 (Declaration)) which was consolidated with the present interference (105,869 at Paper 3) and thereafter terminated. (105,696 at Paper 114.) 2 The Abraham motion to add claim 193 (105,696 at Paper 108) was granted. (105,696 at Paper 193.) -3- cc (via electronic filing): Counsel for Kawahara: Richard D. Kelly, Esq. Stephen G. Baxter, Esq. OBLON, SPIVAK, McCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, PC 1940 Duke Street Alexandria, VA 22314 Tel: 703-412-6241 Email: rkelly@oblon.com Email: sbaxter@oblon.com Counsel for Abraham: Todd R. Walters, Esq. Erin M. Dunston, Esq. BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC 1737 King Street, Suite 500 Alexandria, VA 22314 Tel: 703-866-6620 Email: todd.walters@bipc.com Email: erin.dunston@bipc.com Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation