Abdul Rahman Ali, Complainant,v.Pete Geren, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 10, 2007
0120072992 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 10, 2007)

0120072992

09-10-2007

Abdul Rahman Ali, Complainant, v. Pete Geren, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Abdul Rahman Ali,

Complainant,

v.

Pete Geren,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120072992

Agency No. ARUSAR06MAR01166

Hearing No. 410-2007-00093X

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts for de novo

review complainant's appeal from the agency's July 3, 2007 final order

concerning his equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaint alleging

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section

501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

Complainant, a former1 Educational Services Specialist, GS-1740-12,

in the Community Relations Division of the Well-Being Directorate, in

the G-1 (personnel) Section of the United States Army Reserve Command

located at Ft. McPherson, Georgia, alleged in a formal complaint

dated May 8, 2006, that the agency discriminated against him on the

bases of race (African-American), national origin (African-American),

sex (male), religion (Muslim), disability (high blood pressure), age

(D.O.B. 05/27/44), and in reprisal for prior protected EEO activity

[arising under an EEO statute that was unspecified in the record] when

he was subjected to a pattern of harassment from October 2005 to April

2, 2006. Complainant listed the following examples of harassment:

(a) in October or November 2005, his religious practice of fasting was

called into question;

(b) he was denied the opportunity to attend conferences and workshops;

c) on or about February 26, 2006, he learned that his position would

not be upgraded to a GS-13;

(d) in early January 2006, his academic qualifications were questioned;

(e) in February 2006, he was directed to obtain approval to continue

using sick leave prescribed by his physician; and

(f) on about March 15, 2006, he was recommended for, but denied, a

three-percent performance award.

After a careful review of the record, the Commission finds that the

AJ's decision without a hearing was appropriate, as no genuine issue

of material fact is in dispute.2 See Petty v. Department of Defense,

EEOC Appeal No. 01A24206 (July 11, 2003). Therefore, we AFFIRM the

agency's final order.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

September

10,

2007

______________________________

__________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Date

Office of Federal Operations

1 The record reveals that complainant retired on April 2, 2006.

2 In this case, we find that the record was adequately developed for

the AJ to issue a decision without a hearing.

??

??

??

??

5

0120072992

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036