Notice of right to hearing
In a lawsuit against you, a Washington court has issued or will issue a Writ of Attachment against your property. Under the writ a sheriff or sheriff's deputy has or will put a lien against your real estate or has seized or will seize other property of yours to hold until the court decides the lawsuit.
Delivery of this notice of your rights is required by law.
You have the right to a prompt hearing. If notice of a hearing date and time is not served with this notice, you have a right to request the hearing. At the hearing, the plaintiff must give evidence that there is probable cause to believe that the statements in the enclosed affidavit are true and also that the claim stated in the lawsuit is probably valid, or else your property will be released.
If the defendant is an individual, the following paragraph shall be added to the notice:
You may also have a right to have your property released if it is exempt property as described in the copies of statutes included with this notice and if you claim your exemptions in the way described in the statutes.
To Defendant:
A writ of attachment has been issued in the above-captioned case, directed to the Sheriff of . . . . . . County, commanding the Sheriff as follows:
"WHEREAS, . . . [Quoting body of writ of attachment]"
You have a right to ask for a hearing. At the hearing, the plaintiff must give evidence that there is probable cause to believe that the ground for attachment alleged in an affidavit filed with the court exists and also that the claim stated in the lawsuit is probably valid, or else the attachment will be discharged.
If the defendant is an individual, the following paragraph shall be added to the published notice:
You may also have a right to have your property released if it is exempt property as described in Washington exemption statutes, including sections 6.13.010, 6.13.030, 6.13.040, 6.15.010, and 6.15.060 of the Revised Code of Washington, in the manner described in those statutes.
RCW 6.25.070
Reviser's note: As to the constitutionality of certain applications of subsection (2) of this section, see Tri-State Dev. v. Johnston, 160 F.3d 528 (9th Cir. 1998) and Van Blaricom v. Kronenberg, 112 Wn. App. 501, 50 P.3d 266 (2002).
Severability-1988 c 231: See note following RCW 6.01.050.