RCW 46.16A.455
Intent-Effective date- 2011 c 171: See notes following RCW 4.24.210.
Effective date-Intent-Legislation to reconcile chapter 161, Laws of 2010 and other amendments made during the 2010 legislative session- 2010 c 161: See notes following RCW 46.04.013.
Effective dates-2005 c 314 ss 110 and 201-206: See note following RCW 46.68.035.
Application-2005 c 314 ss 201-206, 301, and 302: See note following RCW 46.68.035.
Part headings not law-2005 c 314: See note following RCW 46.68.035.
Application-2003 c 361 s 201: "Section 201 of this act is effective with registrations that are due or will become due August 1, 2003, and thereafter." [ 2003 c 361 s 704.]
Findings-2003 c 361: See note following RCW 82.38.030.
Effective dates-2003 c 361: See note following RCW 82.08.020.
Policies and purposes-2003 c 1 (Initiative Measure No. 776): "This measure would require license tab fees to be $30 per year for motor vehicles and light trucks and would repeal certain government-imposed charges, including excise taxes and fees, levied on motor vehicles. Politicians promised "$30 license tabs are here to stay" and promised any increases in vehicle-related taxes, fees and surcharges would be put to a public vote. Politicians should keep their promises. As long as taxpayers must pay incredibly high sales taxes when buying motor vehicles (meaning state and local governments receive huge windfalls of sales tax revenue from these transactions), the people want license tab fees to not exceed the promised $30 per year. Without this follow-up measure, "tab creep" will continue until license tab fees are once again obscenely expensive, as they were prior to Initiative 695. The people want a public vote on any increases in vehicle-related taxes, fees and surcharges to ensure increased accountability. Voters will require more cost-effective use of existing revenues and fundamental reforms before approving higher charges on motor vehicles (such changes may remove the need for any increases). Also, dramatic changes to transportation plans and programs previously presented to voters must be resubmitted. This measure provides a strong directive to all taxing districts to obtain voter approval before imposing taxes, fees and surcharges on motor vehicles. However, if the legislature ignores this clear message, a referendum will be filed to protect the voters' rights. Politicians should just do the right thing and keep their promises." [ 2003 c 1 s 1 (Initiative Measure No. 776, approved November 5, 2002).]
Construction-2003 c 1 (Initiative Measure No. 776): "The provisions of this act are to be liberally construed to effectuate the intent, policies, and purposes of this act." [ 2003 c 1 s 9 (Initiative Measure No. 776, approved November 5, 2002).]
Intent-2003 c 1 (Initiative Measure No. 776): "The people have made clear through the passage of numerous initiatives and referenda that taxes need to be reasonable and tax increases should always be a last resort. However, politicians throughout the state of Washington continue to ignore these repeated mandates.
The people expect politicians to keep their promises. The legislative intent of this measure is to ensure that they do.
Politicians are reminded:
(1) Washington voters want license tab fees to be $30 per year for motor vehicles unless voters authorize higher vehicle-related charges at an election.
(2) All political power is vested in the people, as stated in Article I, section 1 of the Washington state Constitution.
(3) The first power reserved by the people is the initiative, as stated in Article II, section 1 of the Washington state Constitution.
(4) When voters approve initiatives, politicians have a moral, ethical, and constitutional obligation to fully implement them. When politicians ignore this obligation, they corrupt the term "public servant."
(5) Any attempt to violate the clear intent and spirit of this measure undermines the trust of the people in their government and will increase the likelihood of future tax limitation measures." [ 2003 c 1 s 11 (Initiative Measure No. 776, approved November 5, 2002).]
Severability-Savings-2003 c 1 (Initiative Measure No. 776): "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected. If the repeal of taxes in section 6 of this act is judicially held to impair any contract in existence as of the effective date of this act, the repeal shall apply to any other contract, including novation, renewal, or refunding (in the case of bond contract)." [ 2003 c 1 s 10 (Initiative Measure No. 776, approved November 5, 2002).]
Repeal of taxes by 2003 c 1 s 6 (Initiative Measure No. 776): "If the repeal of taxes in section 6 of this act affects any bonds previously issued for any purpose relating to light rail, the people expect transit agencies to retire these bonds using reserve funds including accrued interest, sale of property or equipment, new voter approved tax revenues, or any combination of these sources of revenue. Taxing districts should abstain from further bond sales for any purpose relating to light rail until voters decide this measure. The people encourage transit agencies to put another tax revenue measure before voters if they want to continue with a light rail system dramatically changed from that previously represented to and approved by voters." [2003 c 1 s 7 (Initiative Measure No. 776, approved November 5, 2002).]
Effective date-1994 c 262 ss 8, 28: "Sections 8 and 28 of this act take effect July 1, 1994." [ 1994 c 262 s 29.]
Effective date of 1993 c 102 and c 123-1993 sp.s. c 23: "Chapter 102, Laws of 1993 and chapter 123, Laws of 1993 each take effect January 1, 1994." [ 1993 sp.s. c 23 s 66.]
Effective dates-1993 sp.s. c 23: See note following RCW 43.89.010.
Purpose-Effective dates-Application-Implementation-1990 c 42: See notes following RCW 46.68.090.
Application-1989 c 156: "This act first applies to the renewal of vehicle registrations that have a December 1990 or later expiration date and all initial vehicle registrations that are effective on or after January 1, 1990." [ 1989 c 156 s 5.]
Severability-Effective date-1987 1st ex.s. c 9: See notes following RCW 46.29.050.
Effective dates-1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 64: "Sections 1, 2, and 5 through 24 of this 1976 amendatory act shall take effect on July 1, 1976, and sections 3 and 4 of this 1976 amendatory act shall take effect on January 1, 1977. All current and outstanding valid licenses and permits held by licensees on July 1, 1976, shall remain valid until their expiration dates, but renewals and original applications made after July 1, 1976, shall be governed by the law in effect at the time such renewal or application is made." [1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 64 s 25.]
Severability-1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 64: "If any provision of this 1976 amendatory act, or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act, or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected." [1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 64 s 26.]
Effective date-1969 ex.s. c 281: See note following RCW 46.37.160.
Effective dates-1967 ex.s. c 83: See RCW 47.26.910.