P.R. Laws tit. 4A, § 6

2019-02-20 00:00:00+00
Rule 6. Videotaping as a substitute for views or inspections

In civil or criminal cases where videotaping equipment is to be used as a substitute for inspections, it will be necessary to get the consent of the court and the parties and to coordinate this with the Administrative Judge of the Judicial Center to which the equipment belongs.

(a) When taping is begun, a statement shall be made setting forth the case number, the parties, the attorneys present, the date, time, and exact place where taping is being conducted.

(b) The party requesting the inspection shall tell the videotape technician the takes he wishes to record in the tape. Once said party is through, the other parties shall be entitled to ask for the takes they think should be part of the inspection.

(c) Once videotaping is over, a final statement shall be made of the time when work was finished.

History —Dec. 30, 1981, eff. Jan. 1, 1982.