Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-109
(1969, P.A. 828, S. 111; 1971, P.A. 871, S. 20; P.A. 92-260, S. 44; P.A. 05-234, S. 3; P.A. 12-84, S. 1.)
Cited. 203 Conn. 466; Id., 624; 240 Conn. 708. Cited. 20 Conn.App. 599; 24 Conn.App. 195; 35 Conn.App. 714. Cited. 35 Conn.Supp. 555. Subsec. (a): Evidence that defendant entered building by not using main entrance but instead forcing open a locked door labeled with a no trespassing sign was sufficient to support conviction under section. 83 CA 377. Statute does not demand that premises be completely enclosed to fall within its purview, but they must be enclosed sufficiently to exclude intruders, namely, those who purposefully enter the property despite having no legitimate reason to do so; where entire property was enclosed by combination of concrete wall and chain link fence, save only for opening in front, which allowed pedestrian traffic to access sidewalk by way of set of steps, property was sufficiently enclosed, even with small gateless entryway, to bring it within the protections of section. 105 CA 179.
See Sec. 53a-44a re surcharge on fine for trespass on public land.