Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-434a
(1967, P.A. 772; P.A. 74-309, S. 9, 17; P.A. 76-436, S. 10a, 408, 681; P.A. 82-160, S. 168; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-29, S. 58, 82.)
Cited. 158 C. 16; Id., 291; 162 C. 79; 163 Conn. 15; Id., 259; 164 Conn. 360; 172 C. 341; Id., 362; 173 Conn. 161; 182 C. 193; 203 C. 364; 221 C. 736. Procedural provisions of statutes that are inconsistent with this section are superseded by it insofar as such statutes limit authority of judge trial referee to render judgment on his or her own findings. 263 Conn. 155. Cited. 7 Conn.App. 136; 20 Conn.App. 148; 21 Conn.App. 359; 31 Conn.App. 723; 35 CA 9; 43 Conn.App. 397. Judge trial referees exercise the same jurisdiction as judges of the Superior Court, and any limitation contained in general statutes or rules of practice regarding the types of cases that judge trial referees may be involved in do not implicate the jurisdiction of judge trial referees to hear certain of those cases, but, rather, concern their authority to do so. 165 Conn.App. 737. Cited. 30 Conn.Supp. 354. Subsec. (a): Judge trial referees have same powers and jurisdiction as judges of the court from which proceedings have been referred to them, and thus may preside over motions for contempt. 140 CA 64. Subsec. (b): Cited. 172 C. 234. Judgment of a majority of a committee composed of three state referees is not invalid for lack of unanimity. 176 Conn. 391. Cited. 181 Conn. 217; 192 Conn. 377. Subsec. (c): In enacting Subsec., legislature made clear its intention to vest judge trial referees with all powers of Superior Court judges in civil matters referred to them. 263 Conn. 155.