Conn. Gen. Stat. § 36a-290
(1953, S. 2779d; 1961, P.A. 405; 1971, P.A. 417; P.A. 78-121, S. 10, 113; P.A. 88-65, S. 7; P.A. 92-12 , S. 2 ; P.A. 94-122 , S. 131 , 340 .)
Annotations to former section 36-3: Cited. 139 C. 350 ; 142 C. 257 . Intent of legislature is to give to the survivors an unrebuttable presumption of ownership, but the determination of the respective rights of the parties inter vivos is left to the common law. 154 C. 456 . Cited. 172 C. 292 ; 176 C. 657 ; 177 C. 53 ; 183 C. 96; 195 C. 82 ; 226 C. 51 ; 232 C. 172 . Cited. 2 CA 430 . Legislative rule of evidence which has the effect of shifting a burden of proof is not an unconstitutional invasion of the legislative into the judicial sphere; statute affects the introduction of evidence, it does not impinge on independence of the judicial branch. Id., 622. Cited. 7 CA 735 ; 13 CA 662 . Cited. 43 CS 360 . Annotations to present section: Cited. 240 C. 343 . Section does not immunize joint account holders from criminal consequences for improper withdrawals, and the determination of ownership of joint funds as between coholders is a question of fact dependent on the intent of the joint account holders and all circumstances surrounding the joint account's creation and maintenance. 307 C. 592 . Testimony that joint account was created to help pay decedent's expenses is not clear and convincing evidence sufficient to overcome statutory presumption that it was intended to be a gift to the survivor; such payment of expenses is not inconsistent with an intent to vest title in the surviving account holder. 60 CA 665 . Subsec. (a): Serves only as a bank protection provision and does not determine ownership interests in funds in joint account. 79 CA 112 . Subsec. (b): Where one owner of joint account dies, two survivors have ownership interests in account funds and trial court's finding that one owner's withdrawal of all funds was a conversion of funds was not clearly erroneous. 79 Conn.App. 112 .