As used in this chapter:
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 22-327
(1949 Rev., S. 3374; 1949, S. 709b; 1953, S. 1812d; 1959, P.A. 637, S. 2; 1961, P.A. 67; 1963, P.A. 613, S. 1; 1969, P.A. 81, S. 1; 423, S. 1; 1971, P.A. 872, S. 446, 448; 1972, P.A. 180, S. 1; P.A. 77-314, S. 1; P.A. 82-91, S. 14, 38; P.A. 91-46 , S. 10 , 12 ; 91-59 , S. 1 ; P.A. 93-435 , S. 29 , 95 ; P.A. 98-12 , S. 3 , 22 ; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-6, S. 146 (e); P.A. 04-189 , S. 1 .)
"Kennel" defined. 84 C. 640 . One who treats dog as living at his home and undertakes to control his actions is the owner, keeper or harborer. 117 C. 309 ; 119 C. 650 . Both husband and wife within definition of "keeper". Id. One having temporary custody of dog was not "keeper". 126 C. 123 . Defendants were "keepers" as a matter of law. 138 C. 718 . Cited. 139 C. 628 ; 221 C. 14 ; 241 C. 319 . Cited. 7 CA 19 ; 9 CA 495 . Exercising control over the actions of a dog as well as feeding, watering, housing or otherwise caring for a dog can be evidence of "keeper" status. 120 CA 324 . What constitutes harboring or having in possession. 5 CS 150 . Owners of premises where dog was kept considered "keepers" and held liable for damage done by dog. 36 CS 156 .