Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-91
(September, 1957, P.A. 18; 1959, P.A. 191, S. 1, 2, 3; 1961, P.A. 477; 1963, P.A. 510; 1971, P.A. 358, S. 1; P.A. 77-614, S. 139, 610; P.A. 79-610, S. 3, 47; P.A. 80-393, S. 1, 2; P.A. 85-572, S. 1, 3; P.A. 87-346, S. 3, 4; P.A. 92-64 , S. 2 , 3 ; P.A. 94-201 , S. 5 , 7 ; P.A. 95-283 , S. 41 , 68 ; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 01-6 , S. 82 , 85 ; P.A. 03-234 , S. 1 ; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-6, S. 146 (e); P.A. 04-189 , S. 1 ; P.A. 05-228 , S. 8 ; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 05-3 , S. 113 ; P.A. 11-233 , S. 4 ; P.A. 14-33 , S. 2 .)
Cited. 156 C. 110 . Where principal means of livelihood of plaintiff and its shareholders was from the loam and gravel business, which court found not to be a farming operation, farm machinery was not exempt. 26 CS 163.