The provisions of this interstate compact executed between the States of Nevada and California are as follows:
TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING COMPACT
As used in this compact, the following terms have the following meanings:
The governing body of the agency shall be constituted as follows:
No member or employee of the agency shall make, or attempt to influence, an agency decision in which they know or have reason to know that they have an economic interest. Members and employees of the agency must disqualify themselves from making or participating in the making of any decision of the agency when it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision will have a material financial effect, distinguishable from its effect on the public generally, on the economic interests of the member or employee.
Whenever under the provisions of this compact or any ordinance, rule, regulation, or policy adopted pursuant thereto, the agency is required to review or approve any project, public or private, the agency shall take final action by vote, whether to approve, to require modification or to reject such project, within 180 days after the application for such project is accepted as complete by the agency in compliance with the agency's rules and regulations governing such delivery unless the applicant has agreed to an extension of this time limit. If a final action by vote does not take place within 180 days, the applicant may bring an action in a court of competent jurisdiction to compel a vote unless the applicant has agreed to an extension. This provision does not limit the right of any person to obtain judicial review of agency action under subdivision (h) of Article VI. The vote of each member of the governing body shall be individually recorded. The governing body shall adopt its own rules, regulations, and procedures.
The planning commission shall then recommend such plan or amendment to the governing body for adoption by ordinance. The governing body may adopt, modify, or reject the proposed plan or amendment, or may initiate and adopt a plan or amendment without referring it to the planning commission. If the governing body initiates or substantially modifies a plan or amendment, it shall hold at least one public hearing thereon after due notice as required in this subdivision.
If a request is made for the amendment of the regional plan by either of the following entities, the governing body shall complete its action on the amendment within 180 days after that request is accepted as complete according to standards that must be prescribed by ordinance of the agency:
The regional plan shall be a single enforceable plan and include all of the following correlated elements:
If increases in capacity are required, the agency shall give preference to providing that capacity through public transportation and public programs and projects related to transportation. The agency shall review and consider all existing transportation plans in preparing its regional transportation plan pursuant to this paragraph.
The plan shall provide for an appropriate transit system for the region.
The plan shall give consideration to all of the following:
Until the regional plan is revised, or a new transportation plan is adopted in accordance with this paragraph, the agency has no effective transportation plan.
In formulating and maintaining the regional plan, the planning commission and governing body shall take account of and shall seek to harmonize the needs of the region as a whole, the plans of the counties and cities within the region, the plans and planning activities of the state, federal, and other public agencies and nongovernmental agencies and organizations that affect or are concerned with planning and development within the region.
1. City of South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County (combined) ........................ | 252 |
2. Placer County ........................ | 278 |
3. Carson City ........................ | 0 |
4. Douglas County ........................ | 339 |
5. Washoe County ........................ | 739 |
1. City of South Lake Tahoe and El Dorado County (combined) ........................ | 64,324 |
2. Placer County ........................ | 23,000 |
3. Carson City ........................ | 0 |
4. Douglas County ........................ | 57,354 |
5. Washoe County ........................ | 50,600 |
The moratorium imposed by this subdivision does not apply to work done pursuant to a right vested before the effective date of the amendments to this compact. Notwithstanding the expiration date of the moratorium imposed by this subdivision, no new highway may be built or existing highway widened to accommodate additional continuous lanes for automobiles until the regional transportation plan is revised and adopted.
The moratorium imposed by this subdivision does not apply to the construction of any parking garage that has been approved by the agency before May 4, 1979, whether that approval was affirmative or by default. The provisions of this paragraph are not an expression of legislative intent that any such parking garage, the approval of which is the subject of litigation that was pending on the effective date of the amendments to this compact, should, or should not, be constructed. The provisions of this paragraph are intended solely to permit construction of such a parking garage if judgment sustaining the agency's approval to construct that parking garage has become final and no appeal is pending or may lawfully be taken to a higher court.
The agency shall make this determination within 60 days after the proposal is delivered to the agency in compliance with the agency's rules or regulations governing such delivery unless the applicant has agreed to an extension of this time limit. If an external modification is determined to have any of the effects enumerated in subparagraphs (A) through (C), it is prohibited. If an external modification is determined to have any of the effects enumerated in subparagraph (D) or (E), it is subject to the applicable provisions of this compact. If an external modification is determined to have no such effect, it is not subject to the provisions of this compact.
The Nevada agency shall transmit this information to the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.
Those legal actions may be filed and the provisions of this subdivision apply equally in the appropriate courts of California and Nevada and of the United States.
A separate written finding shall be made for each significant effect identified in the environmental impact statement on the project. All written findings must be supported by substantial evidence in the record.
Ca. Gov. Code § 66801