Ohio R. Superi. Ct. 36.25

As amended through July 25, 2024
Rule 36.25 - Site Review
(A) Performance of site review

Staff of the Specialized Dockets Section of the Supreme Court shall conduct a site review of the treatment team meeting and status review hearing for a court of common pleas, municipal court, or county court or division of the court that has received initial certification pursuant to Sup.R. 36.24. The section shall provide the judge of the court or division notice by regular or electronic mail specifying the date and time for the visit and identifying which staff of the court or division shall be available for interview during the visit. If the identified staff are not available for interview during the visit, the manager of the section, pursuant to Sup.R. 36.26(A), may recommend the application be denied.

(B) Unsatisfactory site review

If upon conducting the site review pursuant to division (A) of this rule a deficiency is identified, staff of the section shall provide the judge of the court or division technical assistance pursuant to Sup.R. 36.29(B). If technical assistance does not resolve the deficiency, staff of the section shall provide the judge of the court or division notice by regular or electronic mail identifying the deficiency. Staff of the section may conduct additional site reviews to verify compliance. If the judge fails to correct the deficiency within forty-five days after the notice is issued, the manager of section, pursuant to Sup.R. 36.26(A), may recommend the application be denied.

Ohio. R. Superi. Ct. 36.25

Amended August 18, 2020, effective 1/1/2021.