Ohio. App. R. 13
Staff Note (July 1, 2015 amendment)
App. R. 13(B) is amended by correcting a typographical error. The reference to App. R. 11.1 has been changed to App. R. 11.2, as the need for immediate service applies in expedited appeals, not accelerated appeals.
App. R. 13 is also amended by adding a new division (D), permitting a party to use a court's transmission facilities to serve other parties by electronic means if so authorized by local rule, and the subsequent division of the rule is re-lettered accordingly. The amendment eliminates a duplication of effort resulting from the 2012 amendments to App. R. 13(C), which permitted a party to use electronic means to fulfill the party's App. R. 13 duty to serve all other parties but did not authorize the party to use the facilities of a local court's electronic filing system to perform that duty-even though, under local rules, the court's facilities nevertheless serve by electronic means all parties participating in the electronic filing system. The new provision is the same as Civ. R. 5(B)(3), as also adopted July 1, 2015.
Staff Note (July 1, 2001 Amendment)
Appellate Rule 13Filing and Service
Appellate Rule 13(A) Filing
The amendments to this rule were part of a group of amendments that were submitted by the Ohio Courts Digital Signatures Task Force to establish minimum standards for the use of information systems, electronic signatures, and electronic filing. The substantive amendment to this rule was the addition of the last two sentences of division (A) and the addition of divisions (A)(1) - (3). Comparable amendments were made to Civil Rule 5, Civil Rule 73 (for probate courts), Criminal Rule 12, and Juvenile Rule 8.
As part of this electronic filing and signature project, the following rules were amended effective July 1, 2001: Civil Rules 5, 11, and 73; Criminal Rule 12; Juvenile Rule 8; and Appellate Rules 13 and 18. In addition, Rule 26 of the Rules of Superintendence for Courts of Ohio was amended and Rule of Superintendence 27 was added to complement the rules of procedure. Superintendence Rule 27 establishes a process by which minimum standards for information technology are promulgated, and requires that courts submit any local rule involving the use of information technology to a technology standards committee designated by the Supreme Court for approval.
Staff Notes (July 1, 2012 Amendments)
The amendment to App.R. 13(C) clarifies the various available methods of service and adds service by electronic means a permissible method. The language of the amendment largely tracks the language of the 2012 amendment to Civ.R. 5(B), so the rules are now linguistically consistent. App.R. 13(B) now also requires parties in expedited cases or original actions involving elections to use a method of service that ensures actual receipt of the filing on the day it is served.