Miss. R. Youth Ct. Prac. 6

As amended through March 21, 2024
Rule 6 - Subpoena Duces Tecum
(a) Procedures for issuing a subpoena duces tecum. No subpoena duces tecum for records involving children, as such records are defined under section 43-21-105 of the Mississippi Code, shall issue from any court other than youth court except upon compliance with the following procedures:
(1) the party shall make an application to the court specifying which records are sought;
(2) the court shall issue a subpoena duces tecum to the youth court for these records;
(3) the youth court, unless a hearing is conducted pursuant to Rule 6(b) of these rules, shall transfer copies of the records to the court;
(4) the court shall conduct an in camera inspection of the records, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987), to determine which records should be disclosed to the party;
(5) the court shall, at all times, protect the confidentiality of the records to the extent required of the youth court under Mississippi's Youth Court Law.
(b) Hearing on access to confidential files. The youth court may require a hearing to determine whether the court or parties have a legitimate interest to be allowed access to the confidential files. In determining whether a person has a legitimate interest, the youth court shall consider the nature of the proceedings, the welfare and safety of the public, and the interest of the child.

Comments & Procedures

Rule 6.

The child's right of confidentiality of youth records is a qualified privilege, not an absolute one. See Daniels v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 634 So. 2d 88, 93 (Miss. 1993). Mississippi has adopted the procedures advanced in Ritchie when there is a request originating in trial court proceedings for disclosure of confidential youth court records. See In re J.E., 726 So. 2d 547, 553 (Miss. 1998). These procedures require the trial judge to:

(1) conduct an in camera review of the requested records and
(2) release any information contained therein material to the fairness of the trial. Such is an ongoing duty. See Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, 60 (1987)

Miss. R. Youth Ct. Prac. 6

The Uniform Rules of Youth Court Practice were revised by order entered 7/17/2012.