S.C. Code Regs. § § 19-445.2122

Current through Register Vol. 48, No. 10, October 25, 2024

Section 19-445.2122 - Price Reasonableness

A. General. The objective of offer analysis is to ensure that the final contract price is fair and reasonable. The procurement officer is responsible for evaluating the reasonableness of the offered prices. Normally, competition establishes price reasonableness. Therefore, when contracting on a firm-fixed-price basis, comparison of the proposed prices will usually satisfy the requirement to perform a price analysis, and a cost analysis need not be performed. In limited situations, a cost analysis (see subsection B(2)) may be appropriate to establish reasonableness of the otherwise successful offeror's price. The analytical techniques and procedures described in this regulation may be used, singly or in combination with others, to ensure that the final price is fair and reasonable. In addition, they should be used to analyze cost or pricing data required by Section 11-35-1830. The complexity and circumstances of each acquisition should determine the appropriate level of detail for the analysis. The appropriate Chief Procurement Officer may develop and issue procedures which shall be followed by all agencies conducting offer analysis. The responsible procurement officer may request the advice and assistance of other experts to ensure that an appropriate analysis is performed.

B. Analytical techniques include, but are not limited to, the following:

(1) Price analysis is the process of examining and evaluating a proposed price without evaluating its separate cost elements and proposed profit. Examples of price analysis criteria include but are not limited to:

(a) price submissions of prospective bidders or offerors in the current procurement;

(b) prior price quotations and contract prices charged by the bidder, offeror, or contractor;

(c) prices published in catalogues or price lists;

(d) prices available on the open market; and

(e) in-house estimates of cost. The responsible procurement officer may use various price analysis techniques and procedures to ensure a fair and reasonable price.

(2) Cost analysis is the review and evaluation of any separate cost elements and profit or fee in an offeror's or contractor's proposal, as needed to determine a fair and reasonable price, and the application of judgment to determine how well the proposed costs represent what the cost of the contract should be, assuming reasonable economy and efficiency. Cost analysis includes the appropriate verification of cost or pricing data, and the use of this data to evaluate:

(a) specific elements of costs;

(b) the necessity for certain costs;

(c) the reasonableness of amounts estimated for the necessary costs;

(d) the reasonableness of allowances for contingencies;

(e) the basis used for allocation of indirect costs;

(f) the appropriateness of allocations of particular indirect costs to the proposed contract; and

(g) the reasonableness of the total cost or price. The responsible procurement officer may use various cost analysis techniques and procedures to ensure a fair and reasonable price, given the circumstances of the acquisition.

C. Unbalanced pricing. All offers with separately priced line items or subline items shall be analyzed to determine if the prices are unbalanced. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more line items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. If the responsible procurement officer determines that unbalanced pricing may increase performance risk (e.g., it is so unbalanced as to be tantamount to allowing an advance payment) or could result in payment of unreasonably high prices, she may conclude that the offer is unreasonable as to price.

S.C. Code Regs. § 19-445.2122

Adopted by State Register Volume 44, Issue No. 04, eff. 4/24/2020.