Example 1:A person purchasing business assets in bulk will take possession of the assets and pay for the same on April 30, 1982. On April 20, 1982 he serves the notice of sale by having such notice hand-delivered to an employee of the Department of Taxation and Finance who has been authorized by the department to accept such service. Since the notice was personally served 10 days before the taking of possession and making payment, the notice is timely.
Example 2:A person purchasing business assets in bulk will take possession of the assets and pay for the same on April 30, 1982. He mails the notice of sale by certified mail--return receipt requested, the sender's receipt for which is postmarked on April 15, 1982. Because of delay in the mails, such notice is not received by the Bulk Sales Unit, Central Office Audit Bureau, Audit Division, until April 23, 1982. Since the notice is mailed by certified mail--return receipt requested, and the sender's receipt is postmarked by an employee of the United States Postal Service, the date of mailing and not the date of receipt governs. Accordingly, the notice is timely.
Example 3:Assume the facts in example 2, except that a return receipt is not requested or that the sender's receipt is not postmarked by an employee of the United States Postal Service. Therefore, the date of receipt governs the timeliness of the mailing. Since the notice is not received within 10 days before the taking of possession and making payment, the notice is untimely.
Example 4:A business places an advertisement in the newspaper offering the sale of its business assets at an asking price of $250,000. In response to the advertisement a prospective purchaser signs a binder with the seller's agent and deposits $250 with the agent to bind the transaction. The details, including the exact items to be sold, are to be set forth in a contract to be subsequently entered into between the parties. The deposit of $250 does not constitute part payment for the sale.
Example 5:A person purchasing business assets in bulk will take possession of the assets on February 23, 1982. The 10th day before that date, February 13th, falls on Saturday. The next day is Sunday, and the next day is a legal holiday in New York State (Washington's birthday). The purchaser mails the notice by registered mail on Tuesday, February 16, 1982. The notice is timely.
Example 6:Assume the same facts in example 5, except that the purchaser makes personal service on Tuesday, February 16, 1982. The notice is timely.
Example 7:Assume the facts in example 5, except that the purchaser mails the notice by ordinary mail and the notice is actually received on Tuesday, February 16, 1982. The notice is timely.
Example 8:The purchaser of a business files a notice of sale with the department on February 9, 1990 which indicates the scheduled date of sale as June 18, 1990. The notice of sale, although received by the department on February 9, 1990 is deemed to have been received on June 8, 1990, 10 days prior to the date of sale indicated by the purchaser in the notice of sale.
Example 9:Assume the same facts as in Example 8 of this section, except that on April 4, 1990 the purchaser files a revised notice of sale with the department stating that the sale will now take place on May 11, 1990. The department will now deem the date of receipt of the notice to be May 1, 1990, the tenth day prior to the new scheduled date of sale.
Example 10:Assume the same facts as in Example 8 of this section except that on April 4, 1990 the purchaser files a revised notice of sale stating that the sale actually took place on March 12, 1990. The date of receipt of the revised notice, April 4, 1990, will be used by the department in determining the dates by which it must fulfill its obligations under subdivisions (a) and (c) of section 537.6 of this Part.
N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. Tit. 20 § 537.2