Section 110.08 - Conduct of the Proceeding(1)Presiding Officer. The Presiding Officer, in conducting the Proceeding, may administer oaths and affirmations, and shall make all decisions on the admission or exclusion of evidence and testimony and on any other procedural matters which arise in the course of the Proceeding. The Presiding Officer may shorten or terminate any phase of the Proceeding for a party's failure, without good cause, to comply with the schedule or to proceed with expedition. The Presiding Officer may grant an extension of time or allow a party's motion for an extension if he or she determines that an extension is appropriate.(2)Ex ParteCommunications. From the start of a Proceeding under 211 CMR 110.00 until the rendering of a final decision, no person who is not employed by the Division shall communicate ex parte with the Commissioner, the Presiding Officer, or any Division employee involved in the decision process for the proceeding in question, with respect to the merits of the proceeding. A request for a report concerning the status of a proceeding or an inquiry as to the Division's practice or procedure shall not be considered an ex parte communication. If the Presiding Officer determines that a party has violated 211 CMR 110.08(2), the Presiding Officer may exclude such party from the hearing or decide against that party with prejudice. If the Presiding Officer determines that a person not a party has violated 211 CMR 110.08(2), the Presiding Officer may exclude that person from the hearing.(3)Oral Statements. Oral Statements are generally heard at the commencement of an initialhearing, but the Presiding Officer may, in his or her discretion, permit Oral Statements later in the course of a Proceeding. Persons making Oral Statements shall not be sworn as witnesses. The Presiding Officer may specify the amount of time allowed to any person making an Oral Statement and, if the Presiding Officer determines that an Oral Statement is irrelevant, immaterial or unduly repetitious, may further restrict the time allowed(4)Motions. A party may, by motion, request a ruling from the Presiding Officer. The motion shall state the ruling sought and the grounds therefor. The Presiding Officer may require a party to submit a motion in writing and may, in his or her discretion, hear oral argument on the motion before rendering a decision.(5)Official Notice. The Presiding Officer may take official notice of any fact which may be judicially noticed by the courts of this Commonwealth and, in addition, may take official notice of general, technical or scientific facts within his or her specialized knowledge; provided that the Presiding Officer shall notify all parties of the material so noticed and shall, upon timely request, permit any party to contest the facts so noticed. The Presiding Officer may utilize his or her technical experience, technical competence, and specialized knowledge in the evaluation of the evidence presented.(6)Evidence. The Presiding Officer need not observe the rules of evidence observed by the courts of Massachusetts or of the United States, but shall observe the rules of privilege recognized by Massachusetts law. Evidence may be admitted and given probative effect only if it is the kind of evidence on which reasonable persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of serious affairs. The Presiding Officer may exclude testimony or evidence which he or she determines is unduly repetitious, or will have an unreasonably dilatory effect upon the Proceeding, or should have been submitted as part of a Rate Filing or Advisory Filing. All evidence, including any records, investigative reports and documents in the possession of the Division, which the Presiding Officer desires to use in making a decision, shall be offered and made a part of the record in the Proceeding, and no other factual information or evidence shall be considered except as provided in 211 CMR 110.08. Documentary evidence may be submitted in the form of copies or excerpts, or by incorporation by reference.(7)Cross-Examination and Rebuttal Evidence. Every party, except as otherwise provided by law, shall have the right to submit written testimony, to cross-examine witnesses, and to submit rebuttal evidence in denial of an affirmative fact which an adverse party has endeavored to prove. To the extent that any party intends to introduce rebuttal and surrebuttal evidence, it shall inform the Presiding Officer, as soon as practicable, of its intention, the subject of the proposed evidence and the identity of any witnesses.(8)Additional Evidence. At any stage of the hearing, the Presiding Officer may call for further evidence upon any issue, and may require any party or parties, or the State Rating Bureau, to present such evidence. The Presiding Officer may, in his or her discretion and for good cause shown, permit a party during the hearing to introduce exhibits and to raise issues not included in its Advisory Filing or Rate Filing.(9)Control of Testimony. If the Presiding Officer determines that the testimony of a witness is irrelevant, immaterial or repetitious, he or she may order the witness to limit or omit further testimony on a particular subject or to cease testifying. The Presiding Officer shall have the right to question witnesses at any time in the course of their testimony.(10)Offers of Proof. A party may make an offer of proof after a ruling by the Presiding Officer excluding proposed evidence The offer of proof shall include a summary of the substance of proposed oral testimony and copies of documents. The Presiding Officer may require that the offer of proof be made in writing. All written offers of proof shall be marked for identification.(11)Stipulations. At any stage of the Proceeding, the parties may stipulate to any pertinent facts, either orally or in writing. If the Presiding Officer rejects a stipulation, in whole or in part, he or she shall so state on the record and shall, as appropriate, allow the parties to present evidence and argument on the issue.(12)Oral Argument. After completion of evidentiary hearings in a Proceeding, the Presiding Officer may, on his or her own or on the motion of any party, allow oral argument. In determining whether oral argument should be allowed, the Presiding Officer shall consider the complexity or importance of the issues, the public interest to be served, and the availability of time.(13)Conduct of Persons Present. All persons present at a hearing shall conduct themselves in a manner consistent with the standards of decorum commonly observed in the Massachusetts courts. When such standards are not observed, the Presiding Officer may take such action as he or she deems appropriate to maintain order, including the exclusion of any disorderly person from the hearing. If the person so excluded is a party, its counsel or its authorized representative, the Presiding Officer may decide against such party with prejudice.(14)Transcripts. The Filing Party shall engage a qualified stenographer officially to record and transcribe a Proceeding. The Filing Party shall pay the stenographer's fees, together with the cost of providing two copies of the transcript to the Division, in the format determined by the Presiding Officer, and one copy to each Statutory Intervenor. Other parties may obtain copies of the transcript from the stenographer at cost.