Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing Corporation; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Decommissioning of NSCC's Over-the-Counter (OTC) Equity Comparison Service

On July 2, 2013, the National Securities Clearing Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change SR-NSCC-2013-09 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) and Rule 19b-4 thereunder. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on July 18, 2013. The Commission did not receive any comments on the proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change.

I. Description

NSCC is amending its rules to decommission the over-the-counter (“OTC”) Equity Comparison Service and delete two obsolete provisions in Procedure II, “Trade Comparison and Recording Service.”

OTC Equity Comparison Service

Currently, NSCC provides a framework to compare and record transactions in eligible equity and debt securities executed on national stock exchanges and in the OTC market, as provided in Rule 7 and Procedure II. Rule 7 and Procedure II both note that NSCC will stop providing comparison services once each exchange and/or marketplace assumes responsibility for trade comparison. According to NSCC, all marketplaces interfacing with NSCC have assumed responsibility for equity comparison and, as a result, NSCC's OTC Equity Comparison Service receives a nominal amount of over-the-counter bilateral equity transaction submissions. Therefore, NSCC is decommissioning its OTC Equity Comparison Service and amend several rules to reflect this, as described below.

This change will not impact comparison services with respect to debt transactions, which are compared through the Real Time Trade Matching (or “RTTM”) system, or transactions submitted to the Obligation Warehouse.

Once the OTC Equity Comparison service is decommissioned, comparison submissions for equity transactions, other than those submitted to the Obligation Warehouse, will not be accepted by NSCC and related output will not be produced. As a result, upon the effective date of this proposal, all equity transactions submitted for processing to NSCC, other than those submitted through the Obligation Warehouse, must be compared prior to submission (i.e., at the marketplace of execution or through FINRA/NASDAQ's Automated Comparison Transaction facility (“ACT”) and submitted to NSCC on a locked-in basis for trade recording).

Changes to Rule 7, Procedure II, Rule 5, Rule 1, Addendum A, and Addendum K

To facilitate this proposal, NSCC is amending several rules. NSCC is amending Rule 7, “Comparison and Trade Recording Operation,” and Procedure II, “Trade Comparison and Recording Service” to reflect changes consistent with the above. These changes also require certain technical changes including re-numbering footnotes and updating cross-references.

NSCC is amending Rule 5, “General Provisions” to reflect changes consistent with the above and to clarify that output issued by NSCC with respect to transactions either compared by it, or recorded locked-in transactions, defined as “Compared Contracts,” evidence valid, binding and enforceable compared transactions for purposes of the Rules.

NSCC is amending Rule 1, “Definitions” to add the definition of “Compared Contracts” as described in Rule 5.

NSCC is amending its fee schedule in Addendum A to delete references to charges associated with OTC equity comparison.

NSCC is amending Addendum K to update a cross-reference to reflect these proposed changes.

Obsolete Provisions in Procedure II

NSCC also is deleting two obsolete provisions in Procedure II. First, NSCC is deleting a provision relating to the submission of municipal securities transactions by members on behalf of non-members since the function is no longer in use. Second, NSCC is deleting a provision relating to potential announcement via Important Notice of the availability of the comparison service for when-issued corporate securities. According to NSCC, NSCC has not scheduled to implement a comparison service for corporate when-issued securities. In the event that NSCC proposes to implement this, NSCC states that it will submit a rule filing to the Commission.

According to NSCC, the effective date of the proposed rule changes will be announced via an NSCC Important Notice at least 30 days in advance of its implementation.

II. Discussion

Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act directs the Commission to approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires the rules of a clearing agency to be designed to, among other things, promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions, assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the custody or control of the clearing agency or for which it is responsible, and protect investors and the public interest. The Commission finds that NSCC's proposed rule changes are consistent with these requirements, primarily because, this change promotes transaction comparison at the point of trade, which increases operational efficiencies. Further, by deleting two obsolete provisions in Procedure II, NSCC is ensuring its rules are accurate and reflect its operations.

III. Conclusion

On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.

It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the proposed rule change (SR-NSCC-2013-09) be, and hereby is, approved.