In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of August 4, 2014 through August 8, 2014.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. the sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;
B. there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States;
2. the country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or
3. there has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) the workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) either—
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss or business by the workers' firm with the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 50 years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e., conditions within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination.
None.
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met.
85,261, Hibu Inc., Cedar Rapids, Iowa. April 18, 2013.
85,261A, Hibu Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. April 18, 2013.
85,261B, Hibu Inc., The Woodlands, Texas. April 18, 2013.
85,261C, Hibu Inc., Spokane Valley, Washington. April 18, 2013.
85,261D, Hibu Inc., Columbus, Ohio. April 18, 2013.
85,261E, Hibu Inc., Effingham, Illinois. April 18, 2013.
85,261F, Hibu Inc., San Diego, California. April 18, 2013.
85,299, Graymark International, Inc., Tustin, California. May 8, 2013.
85,312, Applied Materials, Austin, Texas. May 15, 2013.
85,341, Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., Columbus, Mississippi. May 28, 2013.
85,347, St. Jude Medical, Minnetonka, Minnesota. May 29, 2013.
85,357, Flextronics International Inc., Fort Worth, Texas. June 3, 2013.
85,357A, Motorola Mobility LLC., Fort Worth, Texas. June 3, 2013.
85,363, Regal Beloit Corporation, Mt. Sterling, Kentucky. June 5, 2013.
85,363, Regal Beloit Corporation, Winchester, Kentucky. June 5, 2013.
85,366, Luminus Devices, Inc., Woburn, Massachusetts. June 5, 2013.
85,368, FEI Company, Delmont, Pennsylvania. June 9, 2013.
85,391, Second Shift Manufacturing Group, Sylmar, California. June 23, 2013.
85,407, Quality Ribbon Mills, Inc., Cumberland, Rhode Island, June 24, 2013.
85,414, Commemorative Brands, Inc., Austin, Texas. July 4, 2013.
85,416, Motor Coach Holdings, LLC., Loudonville, Ohio, July 7, 2013.
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been determined that the requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons specified.
None.
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified.
Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA, the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.
85,382, Baldor Electric Company, Fort Smith, Arkansas.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met.
85,362, Catawissa Wood and Components, Inc., Elysburg, Pennsylvania.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign country) have not been met.
85,396, Fabricast Valve, LLC., Longview, Washington.
The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
85,317, Child Care Services, Courtland, Mississippi.
85,394, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Rahway, New Jersey.
85,399, Sandler & Travis Trade Advisory Services, Inc., Farmington Hills, Michigan.
Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 USC 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time.
85,281, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
85,421, YP Holdings LLC., Southfield, Michigan.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of August 4, 2014 through August 8, 2014. These determinations are available on the Department's Web site www.doleta.gov/tradeact/taa/taa_search_form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888-365-6822.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of August 2014.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014-19952 Filed 8-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P