Court of Appeals of Indiana August 1992 casesTofany v. NBS Imaging Systems, Inc.Chaiken v. Eldon Emmor Co., Inc.O'Campo v. O'CampoKleine-Albrandt v. LambDillon v. GloverCNA Insurance Companies (CNA) v. VellucciIn re Marriage of BrownMalooley v. McIntyreGardner v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. BlaylockSpier by Spier v. City of PlymouthPedrick v. StateMatter of A.C.BWeatherford v. StateBecker v. PlemmonsJackson v. StateDriver v. StateMatter of Guardianship of RileyAmax Coal Co. v. AdamsBreeck v. City of MadisonNorth American Roofing v. Westmont SteelCap Gemini America, Inc. v. JuddNorthern Indiana Public Service Co. v. SellSmith v. StateAllstate Ins. Co. v. KepcharNelson v. DenkinsFinch v. FinchBrunner v. Economy Preferred Ins. Co.State Bd. of Public Welfare v. Tioga PinesIndiana Dept. of Public Welfare v. PayneBojrab v. John Carr AgencyWendt v. KerkhofCavazzi v. CavazziKutche Chevrolet v. Anderson BankingSierp v. VogelHughes v. BrooksMcBride v. StateHatcher v. BarnesTudder v. TorresIndiana DLandowner's request for floodway construction permit was denied by the Natural Resources Commission (NRC), and landowner sought judicial review. The Marion Superior Court, James S. Kirsch, J., vacated NRC's order. NRC appealed. The Court of Appeals, Ratliff, C.J., held that: (1) landowner had burden of proving that no harm would come to fish, wildlife or botanical resources through its proposed construction; (2) property was "floodway" within meaning of Indiana Flood Control Act; and (8) landowner was not denied fundamental due process.epartment of Natural Resources v. United Refuse Co.St. Anthony Medical Center v. SmithAtteberry v. AtteberryCrosby v. StateMechanics Laundry Supply v. Wilder OilAlexander v. StateLutheran Hosp. of Ind. v. Public Welfare
