Supreme Court of California December 1895 casesWardlaw v. California Ry. Co.Baker v. Southern California Railway Co.Bailey v. Market Street Cable Railway Co.Kirschner v. DietrichBailey Loan Co. v. HallGriswold v. PierattIn re Estate of MullinNorthey v. Bankers' Life Asso.Ryan v. HollidayEasterbrook v. FarquharsonCavallaro v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Meherin v. SaundersDixon v. SchermeierStimson Mill Co. v. RileyRauer v. FayRichardson v. City of EurekaArbios v. County of San BernardinoVisalia & Tulare Railroad Co. v. HydeIn re Estate of ConnorsWickersham v. CrittendenButler v. AshworthYore v. BoothIn re Estate of PearsonsMutter v. I.X.L. Lime Co.Warren v. HopkinsKrouse v. WoodwardBuckley v. GrayEstate of Walker v. WalkerSchwiesau v. MahonBancroft v. BancroftSchlicker v. HemenwayFlick v. BellIn re RamazzinaPeople ex rel. Menzies v. GunstRichter v. HenningsanCalifornia State Bank v. WebberKrouse v. WoodwardRice v. Trinity CountyBoyer v. Superior CourtRandol v. ScottIn re Estate of WelchHowland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.Estate of Ryer v. RyerEstate of Delaney v. DelaneyKeener v. Eagle Lake Land & Irrigation Co.In re Guardianship of Estates of BeiselRobertson v. BurrellVance v. RichardsonBarnes v. BarnesIn re Estate of ClosGibson v. WheelerPeople v. KamaunuPeople v. WardFreese v. PennieCurtiss v. BachmanMahoney v. San Francisco & San Mateo Railway Co.Prey v. StanleyLevy v. Magnolia Lodge No. 29 I. O. O. F.Ward v. HealyWestern Granite & Marble Co. v. SoucMcKune v. Santa Clara Valley Mill & Lumber Co.Ex parte ClarkSehorn v. WilliamsCastro v. GeilConlan v. SullivanRedfield v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.Williams v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.