From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zusmann v. Zusmann

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 10, 1980
246 Ga. 341 (Ga. 1980)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding that the term "proceedings" in former OCGA § 17-8-5 refers to "objections, rulings and other matters which occur during the course of the evidence as well as any post-trial procedures"

Summary of this case from Harper v. State
See 4 Summaries

Opinion

36653.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 10, 1980.

Contempt. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Wofford.

Macey Zusmann, John M. Sikes, Jr., for appellant.

Dennis, Corry, Webb, Carlock Williams, Robert E. Corry, Jr., Kent T. Stair, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has not followed the appeal procedures required by law in domestic relations cases (Ga. Laws 1979, p. 619; Code Ann. § 6-701.1).

Appeal dismissed. All the Justices concur.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 10, 1980.

Summaries of

Zusmann v. Zusmann

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 10, 1980
246 Ga. 341 (Ga. 1980)

holding that the term "proceedings" in former OCGA § 17-8-5 refers to "objections, rulings and other matters which occur during the course of the evidence as well as any post-trial procedures"

Summary of this case from Harper v. State

holding that a materially identical predecessor of OCGA § 17-8-5 did not require voir dire to be transcribed in non-death penalty cases

Summary of this case from Pearson v. State

In State v. Graham, 246 Ga. 341, 271 S.E.2d 627 (1980), this Court evaluated former Code Ann. § 27-2401, the predecessor statute to OCGA § 17-8-5 (a) ; the old statute is materially identical to the current statute at issue here.

Summary of this case from Allen v. State

noting that voir dire must be made part of record in death penalty cases

Summary of this case from Allen v. State
Case details for

Zusmann v. Zusmann

Case Details

Full title:ZUSMANN v. ZUSMANN

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Sep 10, 1980

Citations

246 Ga. 341 (Ga. 1980)
271 S.E.2d 627

Citing Cases

Allen v. State

OCGA § 17-8-5 (a) provides that "[o]n the trial of all felonies the presiding judge shall have the testimony…

Mccullouch v. State

Our Supreme Court has interpreted this provision to mean that, although objections and rulings thereon made…

39 Citing Cases