From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zimmerman v. Rosiek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1997
245 A.D.2d 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Summary

affirming trial court's order granting a new trial on damages for past and future pain and suffering unless defendants agreed to increase verdict to $75,000 for past and $25,000 for future pain because plaintiff's injuries caused permanent loss of flexibility in his neck and necessitated several surgeries

Summary of this case from Nivar v. Sadler

Opinion

December 31, 1997

Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs contend that the award of damages for the past pain and suffering of Ronald J. Zimmerman (plaintiff) and the failure to award damages to him for future pain and suffering and to plaintiff Ellen Zimmerman on her derivative cause of action deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation. We agree.

Plaintiff sustained a herniated cervical disc, which required an anterior discectomy and a fusion with a right iliac crest bone graft. Plaintiff was unable to work for 22 months as a result of the accident and has permanent loss of flexibility of his neck. The testimony of Ellen Zimmerman concerning the loss of her husband's services and consortium was essentially unrebutted. We therefore conclude that the award of $25,000 for past pain and suffering and the failure to award any damages for future pain and suffering and for loss of services and consortium deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation ( see, CPLR 5501 [c]; Peck v. Tired Iron Transp., 209 A.D.2d 979). Therefore, we modify the judgment by granting a new trial on damages for past and future pain and suffering and loss of services and consortium only, unless defendants, within 20 days of service of a copy of the order of this Court with notice of entry, stipulate to increase the verdict to $75,000 for past pain and suffering, $25,000 for future pain and suffering and $25,000 for loss of services and consortium, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, Jr., J. — Damages.)


Summaries of

Zimmerman v. Rosiek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1997
245 A.D.2d 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

affirming trial court's order granting a new trial on damages for past and future pain and suffering unless defendants agreed to increase verdict to $75,000 for past and $25,000 for future pain because plaintiff's injuries caused permanent loss of flexibility in his neck and necessitated several surgeries

Summary of this case from Nivar v. Sadler

increasing award of $25,000 to $75,000 for past pain and suffering and awarding $25,000 for future pain and suffering where plaintiff suffered a herniated cervical disc that required surgery and resulted in permanent loss of neck flexibility

Summary of this case from Hurt v. City of New York
Case details for

Zimmerman v. Rosiek

Case Details

Full title:RONALD J. ZIMMERMAN et al., Appellants, v. DONALD J. ROSIEK et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 69

Citing Cases

Nivar v. Sadler

Appendix A Hairston v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 823 N.Y.S.2d 391 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2006) (reversing…

Kahl v. MHZ Operating Corp.

d suffering was set aside as inadequate and the awards were increased to $60,000 and $40,000, respectively…