From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ziegler v. Allied Commercial Roofing, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 10, 2014
13-CV-02638 (FB) (JMA) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 2014)

Summary

discussing the TCPA

Summary of this case from Jackson v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc.

Opinion

13-CV-02638 (FB) (JMA)

09-10-2014

MOSHE ZIEGLER, D.D.S., for itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ALLIED COMMERCIAL ROOFING, INC., Defendant.

Appearances: For the Plaintiff: MICHAEL KORSINSKY, ESQ. JOSEPH P. GARLAND, ESQ. Korsinsky & Klein LLP 2926 Avenue L Brooklyn, NY 11210


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Appearances:
For the Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KORSINSKY, ESQ.
JOSEPH P. GARLAND, ESQ.
Korsinsky & Klein LLP
2926 Avenue L
Brooklyn, NY 11210

BLOCK, Senior District Judge:

On July 10, 2014, Magistrate Judge Azrack issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that default judgment be entered against defendant in the amount of $1,600.00, consisting entirely of statutory damages. R&R at 5. The R&R directed plaintiff to serve defendant with a copy of the R&R and provided that defendant's failure to object within fourteen days of receipt would preclude appellate review. See id. Plaintiff served a copy of the R&R on defendant by mail on July 23, 2014. To date, no objections to the R&R have been filed.

If clear notice has been given of the consequences of failure to object, and there are no objections, the Court may adopt the R&R without de novo review. See Mario v. P & C Food Mkts., Inc., 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002) ("Where parties receive clear notice of the consequences, failure to timely to object to a magistrate's report and recommendation operates as a waiver of further judicial review of the magistrate's decision."). The Court will excuse the failure to object and conduct de novo review if it appears that the magistrate judge may have committed plain error. See Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility, 219 F.3d 162, 174 (2d Cir. 2000). No such error appears here. Accordingly, the Court adopts the R&R without de novo review and directs the Clerk to enter judgment in accordance with the R&R.

SO ORDERED.

/S/Frederic Block

FREDERIC BLOCK

Senior United States District Judge
Brooklyn, New York
September 10, 2014


Summaries of

Ziegler v. Allied Commercial Roofing, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 10, 2014
13-CV-02638 (FB) (JMA) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 2014)

discussing the TCPA

Summary of this case from Jackson v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc.
Case details for

Ziegler v. Allied Commercial Roofing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MOSHE ZIEGLER, D.D.S., for itself and all others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 10, 2014

Citations

13-CV-02638 (FB) (JMA) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 2014)

Citing Cases

Rosenzweig v. Ro Gallery Image Makers, Inc.

Section 396-aa of the GBL serves as a parallel statute to the TCPA. Gottleib v. Carnival Corp., 436 F.3d 335,…

Jenkins v. Nat'l Grid USA

Plaintiffs may recover damages in the amount of the "'actual monetary loss from such violation, or . . . $500…