Summary
In Wooster, the plaintiff alleged that he had purchased an automobile liability insurance policy from the defendant which required that the defendant not only pay damages on his behalf, but also defend him.
Summary of this case from Juedeman v. National Farmers Un. PropOpinion
1990.
[EDITORS' NOTE: PAGES 420 — 438 CONTAINING WOOSTER v. MIDCENTURY INS. CO. HAVE BEEN OMITTED.]
Deleted on direction of Supreme Court by order dated October 18, 1990.